The First Publication of “Casey at the Bat”

The Library of Congress Blog yesterday celebrated the 125th anniversary of Ernest L. Thayer’s iconic baseball poem “Casey at the Bat” by featuring a recording of the poem made for the occasion, by Washington Nationals radio broadcaster Dave Jageler. Fans of the poem definitely will want to compare Jageler’s interpretation to the classic 1909 recording by De Wolf Hopper available through the Library’s National Jukebox.

Both recordings, of course, owe their existence to the text of the poem, which originally appeared on page 4 of the June 3, 1888, issue of San Francisco’s The Daily Examiner.* Since my quick search of the Web failed to turn up a digitized image of the page, I present here a scan of the page from the Library’s microfilm copy of the paper:

"Casey at the Bat," Page 4, The Daily Examiner (San Francisco, Ca.), June 3, 1888

“Casey at the Bat,” Page 4, The Daily Examiner (San Francisco, Ca.), June 3, 1888

As you can see, the poem appears rather unobtrusively in the fourth column of the page; clearly the editors had no inkling that “Casey” would become the most popular baseball poem ever written! To this day, the story of the hometown slugger who dashes the crowd’s hopes by striking out remains a joy for readers, even if it strikes too close to home for millions of baseball fans everywhere–and as a Philadelphia Phillies fan, I am certainly no exception. Happy Birthday, Casey!

Related Post: Casey Might Have Struck Out, But Thayer Hit a Home Run
Related Post:
Tinker to Evers to Chance


*Many publications cite The San Francisco Examiner as the original source of the poem. The San Francisco Examiner was published under the title The Daily Examiner from 1865-1889. Its name changed to The Examiner in 1889, and finally to the more familiar The San Francisco Examiner in 1902.

Add a Comment

This blog is governed by the general rules of respectful civil discourse. You are fully responsible for everything that you post. The content of all comments is released into the public domain unless clearly stated otherwise. The Library of Congress does not control the content posted. Nevertheless, the Library of Congress may monitor any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove content for any reason whatever, without consent. Gratuitous links to sites are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on the Library site. Read our Comment and Posting Policy.

Required fields are indicated with an * asterisk.