Exploring Different Perspectives on World War I Through Different Responses to the Armistice

Note by President Woodrow Wilson about the Armistice, November 11, 1918

In the October 2017 issue of Social Education, the journal of the National Council for the Social Studies, our “Sources and Strategies” article features two manuscript documents from individuals with very different responses to the armistice that ended the major fighting of World War I. One was a letter by President Woodrow Wilson, who jotted down a few sentences to notify the people of the United States that the war was at its end. This letter is part of the Woodrow Wilson Papers in the Manuscript Division of the Library of Congress, which includes more than 200,000 items related to Wilson’s life and presidential administration. The letter also appears in the Library’s exhibition “Echoes of the Great War: American Experiences of World War I.”

Page from the diary of Private Harry Frieman, November 11, 1918

The other document is a diary entry by Private Harry Frieman, a U.S. infantryman fighting in France. Frieman’s diary is held by the Veterans History Project at the Library of Congress, along with firsthand accounts from thousands of veterans of World War I and all U.S. conflicts since. A sidebar describes the Library’s current efforts to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the United States’ participation in the war, including a new World War I topic page that brings together resources from across the Library.

The two documents, though written at the same time, represent very different perspectives on the war and its end. Wilson’s letter, written on White House stationery, took a global view of the armistice, spending most of its few dozen words describing the role he saw the United States taking in assisting the former combatants and establishing “just democracy throughout the world.” Harry Frieman’s diary, by contrast, recorded the end of fighting in very personal terms. Frieman’s unit was about to attack in foggy conditions, but in the last minutes before 11 am, an officer warned the men that a cease-fire was about to begin. After the shooting stopped at 11 am and the fog lifted, Frieman’s comrades saw that they had been surrounded by German troops. “If the war would have kept up a few hours longer there wouldn’t be many of us left to tell about it.”

The article suggests that analyzing these two documents with the Library’s primary source analysis tool and Analyzing Manuscripts Teacher’s Guide can help students look closely at these documents and make inferences about the circumstances of, and reasons for, their creation. It also describes the ways in which a study of the different perspectives found in the two documents can lead students to think of others caught up in the war—parents, prisoners of war, disabled veterans—and consider what their perspectives on the armistice might have been.

Please share your students’ insights on these documents in the comments below!

 

One Comment

  1. Born Union Soldier
    October 26, 2017 at 12:06 pm

    A PERSPECTIVE ON WAR

    Let us not just look back to reflect upon the conflict. We must also look forward to see if the American society has received any true benefit from the resolution. The fact that we needed to enter WWII, along with the fact that the filthy scum of the nazi are still marching in our streets today, causes me to ask what would Lincoln say? “the fools–they have yet to learn about history”.

Add a Comment

This blog is governed by the general rules of respectful civil discourse. You are fully responsible for everything that you post. The content of all comments is released into the public domain unless clearly stated otherwise. The Library of Congress does not control the content posted. Nevertheless, the Library of Congress may monitor any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove content for any reason whatever, without consent. Gratuitous links to sites are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on the Library site. Read our Comment and Posting Policy.

Required fields are indicated with an * asterisk.