New Podcast Episode: Rebekah Johnson Bobbitt National Prize for Poetry

Nathaniel Mackey. Photo by Shawn Miller.

It’s Thursday, which means we’re bringing you another episode of From the Catbird Seat, our new poetry podcast series!

In this third episode, we check in with the three jurors of the 2016 Rebekah Bobbitt Johnson National Prize for Poetry: Mary Szybist, appointed by Librarian of Congress Carla Hayden; Danielle Legros Georges, appointed by Poet Laureate Juan Felipe Herrera; and Betty Sue Flowers, the long-time juror appointed by the Bobbitt family.

The Rebekah Bobbitt Johnson National Prize for Poetry was established at the Library of Congress in 1988, and has been awarded biennially since 1990. This $10,000 prize recognizes the most distinguished book of poetry written by an American poet and published during the preceding two years, or it recognizes the lifetime achievement of an American poet.

In early 2017, over the course of six weeks, the prize jurors convened over phone calls and e-mails to discuss the 130 books submitted for prize consideration. In the end, they emerged with two winners: Claudia Rankine for her book Citizen, and Nathaniel Mackey for lifetime achievement.

Claudia Rankine. Photo by Shawn Miller.

In a short interview with Mary Szybist, Danielle Legros Georges, and Betty Sue Flowers, we learn the process behind their decision to award the prize to both Claudia Rankine and Nathaniel Mackey. Then, we’ll listen to a segment of the prize reading with the winning poets themselves, which took place in the Library’s Mumford Room in April 2017.

To listen and subscribe to From the Catbird Seatvisit our podcast site or find it on iTunes. To learn even more about 2016 winners Claudia Rankine and Nathaniel Mackey, visit our blog archive.

 

Add a Comment

This blog is governed by the general rules of respectful civil discourse. You are fully responsible for everything that you post. The content of all comments is released into the public domain unless clearly stated otherwise. The Library of Congress does not control the content posted. Nevertheless, the Library of Congress may monitor any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove content for any reason whatever, without consent. Gratuitous links to sites are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on the Library site. Read our Comment and Posting Policy.

Required fields are indicated with an * asterisk.