Top of page

Certificates printed and mailed
Certificates printed and mailed

Decreased Processing Times for Copyright Registrations

Share this post:

The following is a guest post by Robert J. Kasunic, Associate Register of Copyrights and director of Registration Policy & Practice.

At the beginning of October, the Copyright Office updated our Registration Processing Times and FAQ, found on our registration portal, to reflect significant decreases in the time it takes us to review copyright registration applications. Reflecting full fiscal year 2019 (October 1, 2018, to September 30, 2019) activity, this new data is exciting because it shows how much progress we have made in the past year.

This latest report reflects consistent reductions in registration processing times, reflecting the hard work of our staff handling these claims. This FY2019 data builds on work that the Copyright Office has been undertaking in recent years, as described in our May 31, 2019, letters to the Judiciary Committees of the Senate and the House of Representatives. There we also reported significant improvements in reducing registration processing times over the 18-month period of October 2017 through April 2019.

Specifically, since October 2018, the Copyright Office has reduced registration processing times and the number of pending claims as follows:

Claims that do not require correspondence
Claims that do not require correspondence
  • We decreased the overall average processing time for reviewing copyright claims from seven months to four, a substantial decrease of over 42 percent within a one-year period.
  • The average processing for the 72 percent of claims submitted through the electronic registration system and do not require correspondence has decreased by 50 percent, from six months to three.
  • Average processing times for electronic claims that require correspondence decreased by 33 percent, from nine months to six.
  • Average processing times for all claims submitted by mail decreased by more than 50 percent; of the mail claims, processing times for those that did not require correspondence decreased from nine months to six and for those requiring correspondence decreased from twenty months to thirteen.
  • We also reduced the number of workable claims on hand by almost 50 percent. At the beginning of fiscal year 2019, the Office had 184,506 workable claims on hand. But by the end of the year, the Office had closed 89,221 of these claims, effectively eliminating the backlog. As of the September 30, 2019, we had 95,285 claims on hand.
Certificates printed and mailed
Certificates printed and mailed

These improvements are good news for both the Copyright Office and applicants. We are able to more quickly process claims, which allows applicants to receive decisions more quickly. These decreases help us deliver registration services in an expert and timely manner while maintaining a high level of quality and accuracy. And while this is impressive, we also can provide special handling in certain situations so applicants can get decisions even faster. And applicants may also get speedy decisions with preregistration, which, while not a substitute for registration, provides access to courts for works that are vulnerable to being infringed before they are released.

Keep up to date on our processing times by checking out our processing time webpage, which we update every six months. We are committed to continuing to look for ways to examine applications quickly and effectively and are happy that our efforts are paying off.

Comments (4)

  1. Congratulations! This is a credit to your leadership and the extraordinary work of the staff.

  2. Happy too I still have a bunch of work to register I hope to do so this beginning of the month and expect close it as soon as possible…

  3. The article is misleading. Fails to state what is driving the decrease. This article or a follow up article must break out type of work and subtypes, for example, photograph, writing, art, etc. This should be a detailed spreadsheet with types, subtypes, quantity and costs. This should also break out the the submittal over time by Individual 1, 2,…n. This will tell us if the changes impacted individual submittal.

    Two changes may be driving this reduction:
    1. Increase cost.
    2. Recent change to Group Published and Unpublished Registration, where the number of photos were significantly reduced to 750 and cost increased. This went against industry and photography recommendation, especially true for social media images and travel and tourism. This has caused me to reduce the content and storytelling. I have intentional reduced the submittals to 750 per 90 days. Why 90? 90 days is the maximum number of days a work must be submitted for registration to be permitted attorney fees and other to be collected.
    3. This should also have the number of clean submittals and the number of times Examiner interaction with the submitter.

    Finally, what is the Copyright Office;s Registration?

  4. Copyright Office should allow everyone to remove home address from the copyright catalog (currently it’s very hard to remove the address), I see that the catalog is actually very big privacy threat because in the catalog there is also childrens home addresses!

    Some artist maybe become later celebrity and it’s dangerous if the home addresses are public.

    I also know cases where third party have registered the works and they have published claimants address without claimants permission.

Add a Comment

This blog is governed by the general rules of respectful civil discourse. You are fully responsible for everything that you post. The content of all comments is released into the public domain unless clearly stated otherwise. Your submission may be subject to disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The Library of Congress does not control the content posted. Nevertheless, the Library of Congress may monitor any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove content for any reason whatever, without consent. Gratuitous links to sites are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on the Library site. Read our Comment and Posting Policy.

Required fields are indicated with an * asterisk.