Top of page

Blue dotted background spelling out a large A and I; text reads: Copyright and Artificial Intelligence Webinars

Our Summer of Artificial Intelligence: Copyright Office Hosts Two Webinars on Copyright and AI

Share this post:

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a significant new focal point for the Copyright Office in 2023. The Office launched an AI initiative in mid-March, which was followed by four comprehensive listening sessions in April and May and then, most recently, by two very popular webinars in June and July.

The webinars, which continued to break attendance records for the Copyright Office, provided an opportunity for the Office to dive deeper into the copyright registration guidance for AI-generated works and perspectives on how AI impacts copyright systems both domestically and across the globe. The webinars were open to the public, and everyone from copyright experts to those curious about copyright could take something away.

The Office’s first webinar in June, Registration Guidance for Works Containing AI-generated Content, was hosted by Associate Register of Copyrights and Director of Registration Policy and Practice Rob Kasunic and deputy director of registration policy and practice Erik Bertin. Kasunic and Bertin walked attendees through the Office’s registration guidance and discussed a variety of hypothetical examples of copyright registration claims featuring some amount of AI-generated content and how the Office would evaluate them. Through the detailed examples, Kasunic and Bertin offered key insights and recommendations for how applicants can navigate registration applications as they register their own creative works.

The webinar wrapped up with a moderated Q&A session. Attendees were encouraged to submit questions during the presentation, and we received nearly 250 questions by the end of the webinar. The attendance climbed to nearly 2,000 people over the 75-minute webinar, a new record for the Office.

If you missed the webinar on registration guidance in June, you can check out a full recording and transcript on our website.

The Office’s second webinar, International Copyright Issues and Artificial Intelligence, was hosted by Office of Policy and International Affairs attorneys and featured two hour-long panels with international copyright experts. Attendance at the second webinar also reached nearly 2,000 people, demonstrating the sustained excitement and curiosity concerning the global conversation around AI and copyright.

Register of Copyrights Shira Perlmutter provided opening remarks and explained why she thought this international conversation was integral to the Office’s AI initiative:

“We know that AI’s use and its impact are not bound by any national borders. . . . [G]overnments around the world are confronting similar legal and policy questions. . . . Looking at the global copyright landscape, several questions have begun to emerge. First, how do international copyright treaties apply to determining authorship and scope of subject matter protection and exceptions and limitations? Second, what actions are other countries or regions starting to take on AI and copyright issues? In what respects are these approaches similar to or different from ours in the United States? Can consensus approaches be found, and if so, through what mechanisms? And finally, to the extent there is divergence, what are the international implications?”

The first panel kicked off with four exciting presentations on developments in AI and copyright legislation and litigation outside the United States.

  • Peter Yu, from Texas A&M University School of Law, presented on copyright and artificial intelligence across Asia, particularly in China, Singapore, Japan, and Korea.
  • Marcus von Welser, from Vossius in Germany, walked attendees through the European Union’s proposed AI Act and existing text and data mining exceptions from the Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive.
  • Luca Schirru, from KU Leuven in Belgium, presented perspectives on text and data mining developments, including from the global south.
  • Shlomit Yanisky-Ravid, from Ono Academic College in Israel, spoke about the effects of language and bias in generative AI technologies on non-English speaking countries and communities.

The second panel featured a lively moderated discussion on authorship, training, exceptions, and limitations of generative AI. The panel was moderated by two Copyright Office attorneys and comprised Jane Ginsburg from Columbia Law School, Andres Guadamuz from the University of Sussex, Bernt Hugenholtz from the University of Amsterdam, and Matthew Sag from Emory University School of Law. The panelists answered questions from the moderators and engaged directly with each other’s perspectives.

If you missed the webinar on international perspectives on copyright and AI in July, you can check out a full recording and transcript on our website.

The Office’s two webinars wrapped up a busy spring and summer season of listening, information gathering, and direct outreach on AI and copyright. Between April and July, nearly 8,000 people participated in or attended the Office’s AI listening sessions and webinars. This fall, the Office will receive public comments on a notice of inquiry as the work continues on our AI initiative. Follow for updates and events, and sign up for email notifications on our website.

Comments (10)

  1. Please include me in all AI webinars and information from the copyright office. Thank you

  2. thanks

  3. Have these been recorded??

  4. This is all Super Wonderful and timely as expected from you all, especially when the Writer’s Guild of America could certainly have used it for the last 5 months during their strike. My sincerest gratitude to every entity aligned with the copyright system! It was my extreme honour to be a Beta Tester for Eco and I look forward to a Forever Collaboration. Please take great care of yourselves!!! Shine On! Kameena Star

  5. Please remove My Copyright Videos And Reels I request You please 🙏

    • Thank you for your comment. Please contact the Public Information Office for assistance by email at [email protected] or by phone at (877) 476–0778.

  6. I don’t even have the words at this moment but I want to express my gratitude and say thank you all.
    With all my heart,

  7. I think US©O need to be mindful of Internet Service Providers (ISP) willful blindness to statutory law 17 U.S. Code § 204(a) because many ISP are creating Terms of Service (ToS) regarding “non-exclusive” licensing of subscribers uploaded content which includes sub-licensing and adaptation rights which are “exclusive rights” not “non-exclusive rights”.

    ISP are writing ToS as if they are full assignments of copyrights to ISP because they are including terms which want to allow un-revocable sub-licensiing and adaptations. This is certainly license over-reach because not even a written exclusive license is a full assignment of copyright (See Gardner v. Nike, 279 F.3d 774 (9th Cir. 2002) so it’s impossible for non-exclusive licenses to convey full ownership of copyrights to ISPs.

    ISPs are then transferring non existent sub-licensing and adaptation rights to other tech companies for use in AI training to potentially use for exponential amounts of derivative works which cannot be protected by copyright because no valid transfer of exclusive rights exists under 17 U.S. Code § 204(a).

    This is going to become a serious problem if it is not addressed as it creates a copyright free for all which essentially ends copyright law! Therefore US©O needs to be fully aware of this before it gets completely out of hand.

    ISPs willful blindness of statuary law under 17 U.S. Code § 204(a) is causing damage, and will cause damages to artists, writers, authors and copyright holders because ISPs are making up their own rules about copyright ownership when they only have non-exclusive rights! It essentially allows vicarious copyright infringement on a massive scale!

Add a Comment

This blog is governed by the general rules of respectful civil discourse. You are fully responsible for everything that you post. The content of all comments is released into the public domain unless clearly stated otherwise. Your submission may be subject to disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The Library of Congress does not control the content posted. Nevertheless, the Library of Congress may monitor any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove content for any reason whatever, without consent. Gratuitous links to sites are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on the Library site. Read our Comment and Posting Policy.

Required fields are indicated with an * asterisk.