{ subscribe_url:'//blogs.loc.gov/share/sites/library-of-congress-blogs/folklife.php' }

John A. Lomax and Alan Lomax papers now online

This is a guest blog post by Todd Harvey, a Reference Librarian and curator of the Lomax collections at the American Folklife Center.

Man with an acoustic guitar stands in front of a sedan, which is parked next to a building.

Arthur “Brother-in-Law” Armstrong, Jasper, Texas. Photo by Ruby Lomax, 1940. Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division. //hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/pp.print

The American Folklife Center announces long-awaited digital access to a tranche of Lomax family correspondence. It follows similar treatment for the Bess Lomax Hawes collection and the Alan Lomax collection. Most of the half-million pages of Lomax manuscripts at the American Folklife Center are now online.

John A. Lomax, Sr., and his son Alan Lomax became stewards of a nascent Archive of American Folk-Song, now the American Folklife Center, in September 1933. Their tenure lasted until Alan separated from the Library of Congress in October 1942. During that period, they administered an archive that grew in scope and volume. The resultant manuscript material—correspondence, memoranda, reports, notes, and writings—was decades later collated into the John A. Lomax and Alan Lomax papers (AFC 1933/001), the focus of the digital collection found at this link.

Handwritten letter from John A. Lomax, dated June 7, 1934.

Correspondence from John A. Lomax, June 7, 1934 from Crowley, Louisiana.  John A. Lomax and Alan Lomax papers. AFC1933/001.

The collection provides a remarkably clear picture of the Lomaxes’ activities. They built the archive—and their careers—while maneuvering within the Library’s byzantine political currents. They created and managed for the Library a dynamic network of politicians, musicians, academics, and other folk music collectors. They hurried, and befriended, and wrote at such a pace that John Lomax’s elegant penmanship seems at times to fly off the page, giving the accurate impression of a man in motion with a national undertaking in his care. John pens a typical dispatch from Crowley, Louisiana, June 7, 1934:

We are in the midst of the Cajuns and Creoles.… We are really embarrassed by the quality of material offered us, our object, of course, being to try and record only the best and representative. Tonight we go far off the beaten track to attend a dance where the music, at least partly, will consist of survivals of early French breakdowns.

Over a decade, successive Library administrators received breathless letters detailing the riches of American cultural expression from both John and Alan Lomax as they etched the voices of everyday people onto instantaneous disc recordings.

Western Union telegram from Alan Lomax, dated Septemer 2, 1938. Telegram reads: Harold Spivacke, Library of Congress, Where is fortnightly fortifier. Am unable to proceed. Letter on the wing. Alan Lomax.

A telegram from Alan Lomax from Charlevoix, Michigan, September 2, 1938. AFC1933/001.

Sometimes the correspondence revealed the challenges of fieldwork, not the least of which came from long weeks of driving and balky recording equipment. Alan spent four months in Michigan during the summer and fall of 1938. Here is a telegram from Charlevoix, Michigan, September 2, 1938. Lomax’s car had broken down and he was low on cash. The ‘fortnightly fortifier,’ then as now, was the bi-monthly federal paycheck.

HAROLD SPIVACKE. LIBRARY OF CONGRESS. WHERE IS FORTNIGHTLY FORTIFIER. AM UNABLE TO PROCEED. LETTER ON THE WING.

Part of the Lomax legacy is a series of publications that showcased the variety of American song genres. The labor songbook, Hard Hitting Songs for Hard Hit People, was compiled by Alan, Woody Guthrie, and Pete Seeger during the early 1940s, but the content was so incendiary that it was not published until 1967. The editors drew from field recordings—especially those of mining activist Aunt Molly Jackson—and pamphlets like Annabel Lee Glenn’s Trade Union Songs.

One type of document, however, that captures my attention more than any other is an address book, and the Lomaxes do not disappoint. Maintaining contact information for persons such as dancer Katherine Dunham (spelled “Catherine” in the notebook entry), musician Huddie Ledbetter, and professor Willard Rhodes demonstrates a wide range of acquaintances and interests.

A collection finding aid, joins a solid body of guides and digital collections that provide analysis and context to what are largely the administrative papers of the archive during the 1930s. But the John A. Lomax and Alan Lomax papers are anything but dry, bureaucratic exchanges. They reveal at turns the humility and hubris, the comity and paternalism that readers have come to associate with this unique duo who recorded undiscovered, 20th century American voices.

3 Comments

  1. mark isenberg
    December 31, 2020 at 3:01 pm

    Thank you for posting more Lomax archives papers,documents online for all of us old folkies to peruse. At the end of awful 2020,this is a belated gift to the Lomax legacy of finding unknown artists and helping them gain followings if not some income. Lucky us and thanks to all who researched the materials.

  2. jh bailes
    December 31, 2020 at 3:11 pm

    is this written by nicole or todd? whoever, the style is colorful and appealing.
    by synchronicity, i am reading the john szwed biography of alan presently. it is wonderful, and this post is like a microcosm of it—a drop from the ocean that indeed gives you the taste of the ocean.

  3. Carl Fleischhauer
    January 8, 2021 at 9:09 am

    Thank you for the summary and update! Great to know when expanded digital resources see the light of day, especially collections that illuminate past chapters of folklife fieldwork. Fortnightly fortifier indeed!

Add a Comment

This blog is governed by the general rules of respectful civil discourse. You are fully responsible for everything that you post. The content of all comments is released into the public domain unless clearly stated otherwise. The Library of Congress does not control the content posted. Nevertheless, the Library of Congress may monitor any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove content for any reason whatever, without consent. Gratuitous links to sites are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on the Library site. Read our Comment and Posting Policy.

Required fields are indicated with an * asterisk.