{ subscribe_url:'/share/sites/library-of-congress-blogs/insights-kluge-center.php', }

How the Lowly Answering Machine Contributed to our Anxiety-Ridden Culture of Continuous Communication

Josh Lauer is a 2019 Digital Studies Fellow at the John W. Kluge Center as well as Associate Professor of Communication at the University of New Hampshire. His research interests include the history of communication technologies as well as consumer credit reporting, the topic of his 2017 book “Creditworthy: A History of Consumer Surveillance and Financial Identity in America.”


Telephone answering machine, Phone-Mate 400. Credit: Smithsonian National Museum of American History

Why the history of answering machines?

If one were to survey the most influential communication technologies of the late twentieth century, the answering machine probably wouldn’t come to mind. Compared to computers, the internet, and mobile phones, the answering machine seems especially low-tech and banal. Yet this relatively simple household device reshaped communication norms in important ways. Above all, answering machines made it possible to be continuously available. This certainly made telephone calling more convenient, but it also introduced new social burdens. It was no longer possible to ignore or dodge incoming calls. Messages could arrive at any hour and, given the certainty of their delivery, each recorded message represented a demand on one’s time and attention.

Though the dilemma of perpetual connection is usually blamed on internet-connected devices that tether us to the world, household answering machines played a role in habituating Americans to these expectations during the 1970s and 1980s. Even more, answering machines introduced new forms of social surveillance, especially through the practice of call screening, and new modes of mediated self-presentation in personalized outgoing messages. Taken together, the history of the household answering machine offers surprising insight into how Americans grappled with new pressures to be continuously available, to negotiate their privacy, and to perform for unseen media audiences. If these issues seem familiar, that’s because they are. These problems are central to twenty-first-century digital life.


What does this history say about the social impacts of emerging communication technologies?

Silicon Valley gurus from Steve Jobs to Mark Zuckerberg have insisted that faster, more pervasive and increasingly seamless communication technologies enrich our lives, but the reality is more complicated. A world of ubiquitous communication, it turns out, can be oppressive. Being instantly reachable via text, email, direct message, or call means that one is never fully free of the obligation to respond. If cable television ushered in the 24/7 news cycle during the 1980s, internet-connected mobile devices seem to have done something similar with personal communication during the early 2000s. Worse still, as more of social life has migrated to digital media, opting out is increasingly difficult. There is immense social and professional pressure to be continuously connected. Those who refuse to participate pay a real price.

The history of the answering machine illustrates how this kind of “communication creep” occurs. The earliest telephone answering devices date to around 1900, and they were primarily intended as an aid for busy professionals and business owners – doctors and dry cleaners, for example. These were very specific contexts, mostly involving emergencies and commerce. When answering machines were eventually marketed to consumers during the 1970s and 1980s, however, this context was generalized. Soon everyone was expected to be “on call.” This might seem like a small thing, but it signaled a shift in the way that Americans understood the telephone’s function and their own accessibility. By the mid-1990s, nearly three-quarters of US households had answering machines. Those without answering machines, or who refused to leave messages because they hated “talking to the machine,” missed out on social and professional opportunities.


What does this history suggest about the future of technological change, particularly the future of communication technologies?

One of the most striking aspects of the household answering machine is the range of unintended uses it facilitated. Beyond creating a world in which continuous telephone availability was expected, answering machines became a kind of proto-social media platform. They allowed users to surveil others, including friends and family, through call screening. They allowed users to express their unique personalities through customized outgoing messages. And their blinking lights and message count features represented a form of social metric that registered one’s popularity. Without answering machines, you never knew if anyone called while you were away. With them, you knew exactly how many calls you received, including the fact that no one called!

These secondary functions, none of which motivated the technology’s original development, are important because they illustrate how technology is shaped by users and how, in turn, these uses can shape new social norms. It also illustrates the unpredictability of technological development. We are accustomed to viewing the history of communication technology as a story of forward progress and improvement. Yet progress – especially progress measured in terms of speed or efficiency – is quite deceptive. Faster, effortless communication can be socially corrosive. Even the lowly answering machine, bought as a household convenience, contributed to our anxiety-ridden culture of continuous media presence and self-conscious media performance.


What Library resources aided you the most in your research?

Since my study is concerned with cultural reactions to the answering machine, rather than its technical development, I focused my attention on press accounts in US newspapers and magazines during the 1970s and 1980s. The Library’s extensive periodical collections were invaluable for this purpose. This project also builds on grant-funded research I conducted over several years at the Smithsonian’s Lemelson Center for the Study of Invention and Innovation.


How can we learn more about your work, follow your work in this area?

This study is part of a larger book project on the cultural history of the telephone in the United States. The book project is ongoing, but I plan to publish my account of the household answering machine in an academic journal. A draft version is available at my university webpage.

A 16th Century Codex Tells a Story of Resistance to Colonial Rule

Jay I. Kislak Chair Barbara E. Mundy is an art historian whose scholarship explores zones of contact between Native peoples and settler colonists as they forged new visual cultures in the Americas. She is Donald and Martha Robertson Chair in Latin American Art History at Tulane University, Senior Fellow of Pre-Columbian Studies at Dumbarton Oaks, […]

Steve Swayne Joins John W. Kluge Center as Chair in Modern Culture

The John W. Kluge Center at the Library of Congress is pleased to announce the appointment of Steve Swayne as Chair in Modern Culture. Swayne, who began his residency in March, is working with the Library’s David Diamond Collection to produce a book on the life and work of the influential 20th century American composer. […]

Kluge Center Welcomes Elizabeth Currid-Halkett into Residence

Kluge Center Welcomes Elizabeth Currid-Halkett into Residence USC Price School of Public Policy Professor Elizabeth Currid-Halkett has been appointed as the Kluge Chair in Modern Culture at the John W. Kluge Center. She will begin her term in June 2022. This appointment is awarded to a scholar of significant accomplishment in modern arts and media […]

Kluge Center Welcomes New Chairs in Residence

Four scholars holding chair positions at the Kluge Center began their terms in residence in September 2021. These positions are filled by invitation of the Librarian of Congress and scholars enjoy individual offices in the Jefferson Building, where they engage in writing and research and interact with other scholars in residence. Keep reading to get […]

Thérèse Bonney: Curator, Photographer, Syndicator, Spy

This is a guest post by Kluge Center Research Assistant Sophia Zahner, an interview with 2021 Kluge Fellow Caroline Riley. Riley is also a Research Associate at the University of California, Davis. Sophia Zahner: How did you become interested in the photography of Thérèse Bonney? How does it relate to your other research projects? Caroline […]

Pillars of Democracy: Rebuilding America’s Trust in the Presidency

For decades America’s civic and governmental institutions have lost the trust of the people, and sometimes even come under direct attack. Commentators offer various explanations for what has happened. Many point to a loss of faith in authority figures beginning with the Vietnam War and the corruption of Watergate, and the movement in the 1960s […]

Watch Now to Learn About the Movements Shaping American Democracy

The John W. Kluge Center and the SNF Agora Institute at Johns Hopkins University are proud to release Social Movements and American Democracy in the 21st Century, a discussion moderated by Theda Skocpol and featuring panelists Hahrie Han, Dana Fisher, and Leah Wright Rigueur. Theda Skocpol, Victor S. Thomas Professor of Government and Sociology at […]

Our Common Purpose: The Complete Collection

In June 2020, the Kluge Center announced Danielle Allen as the winner of the Kluge Prize, launching the Our Common Purpose Campaign for Civic Strength at the Library of Congress. Allen hosted a series of exciting conversations at the Library to explore the nation’s civic life and ways that people from all political beliefs and […]

Nahuatl Passion Plays in the Colonial Era: An Interview With Louise Burkhart

Louise M. Burkhart is Professor of Anthropology at the State University of New York at Albany as well as Jay I. Kislak Chair for the Study of the History and Cultures of the Early Americas at the John W. Kluge Center. Andrew Breiner: Could you start by telling me a little about your background and […]