{ subscribe_url:'/share/sites/library-of-congress-blogs/insights-kluge-center.php', }

Wrestling with the Question of American Identity and Whether Consensus is Possible

On May 13, the John W. Kluge Center held a panel discussion on the changing interpretations of the nation’s founding principles, with the goal of illuminating a shared vision of the United States and its history for Americans across the spectrum of political beliefs. The full event is now available to view.

Kluge Prize Winner Danielle Allen, who moderated the discussion, began by laying out some objectives. The conversation gathered “three outstanding thinkers and doers, each of whom is wrestling with the question of American identity, the question of how to narrate the many identities that form” the United States, and the “hard problem” of “the relationship that citizens and residents of a healthy democratic society should have with one another.”

Key questions, for Allen, included: “How should we name a positive version of that relationship?” and, “what kinds of narratives of our histories do we need in order to anchor that kind of healthy relationship?” Allen emphasized that while agreeing to a single American story may not be possible, acceptance of “plural narratives” that provide different perspectives and understandings of history may be.

Natalia Molina, Distinguished Professor in the Department of American Studies and Ethnicity at the University of Southern California, began by talking about the idea of race as relational. Molina said that much of the attention focused on hate crimes against Asian Americans in early 2021 doesn’t acknowledge the underlying complex of racial relationships and bigotries.

Anti-Asian sentiment throughout the pandemic, Molina said, attempts to make Americans afraid of Central American refugees, and the “othering of immigrants and othering of anyone seen as non-white and therefore non-American” are pervasive. “They keep that hate alive, and they set the stage for the kinds of crimes we see today,” she said, pointing to the recent spate of hate crimes against Asian Americans. “Those stories shape one another.”

Cathy Park Hong, New Republic Poetry Editor and author of the award-winning “Minor Feelings,” said that as the year approaches when people of color form the majority of the US population, “I don’t think we have quite yet figured out how to talk about what the lexicon and narratives will be,” around race. In that light, Hong said she hopes “we will really reevaluate how we talk about who ‘us’ is.”

Previously, Hong said, the idea of “white innocence erased the long legacy of enslavement and genocide of indigenous people, but also, and this is where Asian Americans come in, managing of borders.” She compared the history of Asian Americans and Latino Americans, saying that both have been viewed as diseases to be kept out of the country, and are still subject to strict quotas even after some immigration restrictions were loosened. Hong expressed her hope that the term Asian American could hark back to its origins, when it was used to show solidarity with the Black Power movement and the anti-imperialist movement in the 1960s. She hopes that the term “Asian American is not just a label that flattens us,” but rather that it is used to show opposition to injustice for all oppressed groups, Hong said.

Samuel Goldman, Associate Professor of Political Science at George Washington University, began by describing the growing emphasis on finding a consensus vision of history that emerged in the late 20th century US as the nation made a shift from white political domination towards something resembling a multi-ethnic democracy. “That change required a new way of understanding consensus, that could include a wider range of citizens even if it did not immediately, or perhaps ever, include everyone on equal terms,” he said. But the idea of consensus has limitations, Goldman said, considering the wide variety of people across a large nation.

“At a level of extreme abstraction it’s not so difficult to find some degree of consensus. When you get more specific it gets a lot harder,” he said. Goldman was skeptical of the enterprise, though he did not think it should be abandoned entirely. Still, he advocated for a refocusing away from “the pursuit of consensus and towards the cultivation of more limited and maybe also more controversial forms of association and meaning.” Pursuing consensus results in hedging and “trying to split the difference,” Goldman said, rather than beginning from a statement of what one truly thinks. Instead, he said, bonds would be better cultivated among people who disagree through interacting and living together in person, rather than “relying on social media and grand pronouncements that are easily communicated” by mass media. It would be easier to seek consensus on small things, he said, at the local and community level, rather than trying to find a consensus on the idea of US history as a whole.

Watch the full event:

Why Reforming Electoral Institutions Might Be the Best Way to Change Policymaking

On April 15, the John W. Kluge Center held its second event in the Our Common Purpose Series with Kluge Prize winner Danielle Allen. How Political Institutions Shape Outcomes and How We Might Reform Them convened a panel of experts on the ways that electoral decision-making systems can encourage some outcomes over others. They also […]

Is Civic Media an Antidote to a Polarized World?

The concept of ‘civic media’ was discussed in academic circles before the rancorous political and media fights of the last few years. But only in the last few years, as polarization, disinformation, and the impact of social media have become central concerns in public life, has it become more broadly considered as a possible solution. […]

Is Civic Media the Solution to Trolls, Misinformation, and Abuse Online?

On March 11, the John W. Kluge Center held its first public event in the Our Common Purpose Series with Kluge Prize winner Danielle Allen. Using Civic Media to Build a Better Society brought experts on the use and misuse of media together to discuss the role of information in democratic society, the difficulties of […]

A History of African American Political Thought

On February 22, 2021, the Kluge Center released a Conversation on the Future of Democracy titled “A History of African American Political Thought,” with political theorists Melvin Rogers and Jack Turner. Outreach and Partnerships Program Specialist Janna Deitz interviewed Rogers and Turner on their recent book, African American Political Thought: A Collected History. The book […]

Our Common Purpose: A Series Featuring Kluge Prize Winner Danielle Allen

Danielle Allen, winner of the Library’s 2020 Kluge Prize for Achievement in the Study of Humanity, will host a series of exciting conversations at the Library to explore the nation’s civic life and ways that people from all political beliefs and social causes can build a stronger, more resilient country. The series, called “Our Common […]

African American History Month at the Kluge Center

As part of the Library of Congress’s commemoration of African American History Month, the Kluge Center will be hosting two events that honor the African American scholars and activists who have contributed so much to American democracy. On February 22 at 1pm, join us for A History of African American Political Thought with Melvin Rogers […]

Why We Write: Public Scholarship in Times of Crisis

This is a guest post by Janna Deitz, Kluge Center Program Specialist in Outreach and Partnerships. Scholars in residence at the John W. Kluge Center represent the very best in academic researchers and are further distinguished by their commitment to engage with the public and policymaking community. These scholars bring the Center’s motto of “connecting thought […]

Alumni Outreach and India’s Social Movements: A Summer, Virtually, at the Kluge Center

This is a guest post by Kluge Center intern Julia Bliss. Interning for the Kluge Center this summer has been one of the most rewarding and enlightening experiences of my life. As a junior studying studio art and anthropology at the University of Vermont, I find great joy and satisfaction in research. Growing up on […]

How Distance Learning Could Put Chinese Students at US Universities at Risk

This is a guest post by Aynne Kokas and Michael Xiao. Kokas is a Kluge Fellow, a National Endowment for the Humanities Fellow, as well as Associate Professor of Media Studies at the University of Virginia. Kokas is the author of the book “Hollywood Made in China,” which examines the cultural, political and economic implications […]