Top of page

Chief Standing Bear and His Landmark Civil Rights Case

Share this post:

The National Statuary Hall of the United States Capitol has a number of statues of indigenous Americans—Will Rogers, Kamehameha I, Washakie, Po’pay, Sequoyah, Sakakawea, and the newest—Chief Standing Bear, just donated to the hall by Nebraska and installed in September 2019. If a legal scholar wanted to study an inspiring legal figure for Native American Heritage Month, Standing Bear is a great historical candidate.

Bronze-colored statue of Chief Standing Bear who stands with his right hand outstretched.
             Statue of Chief Standing Bear, National Statuary Hall [photo by Geraldine Dávila González]
Chief Standing Bear (Ma-chú-nu-zhe) was the leader of a band of about 82 Ponca people, living near the banks of the Niobrara River.  With the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, Eastern farmers were eyeing the cheap land that the government was planning to put on offer. The indigenous tribes, including the Ponca, were being urged to sell up and remove themselves to “Indian Territory”.

In 1876, the U.S. government told the Ponca they were being moved to Indian Territory (now Oklahoma). The Ponca did not like the lands assigned to them in Indian Territory, and decided to return to their traditional homelands. However, the U.S. government had other ideas, and, “[w]hen the 8 Ponca chiefs reached their homeland, they found that since the Ponca had refused to go to Indian Territory of their own free will, a government order had been issued on 12 April 1877 to force their removal. Federal troops were called in to enforce the removal orders, and by May 1877, the Ponca had begun their forced migration to “the hot country.”

The trip was grueling for the Ponca, and on the way, Standing Bear’s daughter, Prairie Flower, died, as did many in the party. Shortly after their arrival in Oklahoma, Standing Bear’s oldest son Bear Shield died. Ponca historians say that Standing Bear was “unwilling” to bury his son in Oklahoma. Standing Bear and a party of his people traveled some 600 miles in the middle of winter back to Nebraska and their traditional lands with his son’s body, intending to bury Bear Shield (Starita, 130). However, the U.S. government would not allow the Ponca to leave Indian Territory without permission. The Secretary of the Interior, Carl Schurz ordered General George Crook of the U.S. Army to arrest and return Chief Standing Bear and his party to Indian Territory.

After Crook caught up with Standing Bear and his people, Crook imprisoned them in Fort Omaha Barracks. There was a groundswell of public sympathy for Standing Bear and his people, given the reason he left and his recent past practice of staying in one place and farming. A federal judge with relevant experience, Elmer Dundy, agreed to hear the attorneys representing Standing Bear, John L. Webster and Andrew J. Poppleton, who asked him to grant a writ of habeas corpus. Ultimately, Dundy did so. Standing Bear’s case, United States, ex rel. Standing Bear, v. George Crook, started in May 1879. The U.S. government argued, “that [Standing Bear] was neither a citizen, nor a person, so he could not sue the government.”  Standing Bear’s lawyers argued that under the Fourteenth Amendment, Standing Bear and his fellow Ponca were both citizens and people and entitled to the same constitutional rights as other citizens of the United States. Judge Dundy’s opinion fundamentally agreed with their argument; he wrote, “That an Indian is a PERSON within the meaning of the laws of the United States…”

Base of the Standing Bear statue on a white and black tiled floor. One side of the statue base says "Nebraska, Chief Standing Bear, c. 1829-1908." The other side says "My hand is not the color of yours but if I pierce it, I shall feel pain. If you pierce your hand, you also feel pain."
   Standing Bear (Ponca) Quote from his Testimony on Pedestal [photo by Geraldine Dávila González]
The judge released Standing Bear and his people, and they returned to their lands by the Niobrara. Standing Bear finally buried his son there. Scholars have compared the case in its civil rights impact to the Dred Scott decision and to Brown v. Board of Education (Starita, 146, and Nagle, 456). Native American history is American history, and Chief Standing Bear’s pursuit of his freedom is a landmark point in that story.


KF117 8th .D55 1871 Cases Determined in the United States Circuit Courts for the Eighth Circuit.

E99.P7 S837 2009  Starita, Joe.  “I am a man” : Chief Standing Bear’s journey for justice.

E99.P7 S833 2004  Dando-Collins, Stephen.  Standing Bear is a person : the true story of a Native American’s quest for justice.

E99.P7 H43 2020 Headman, Louis. Walks on the ground : a tribal history of the Ponca nation.

E99.P7 M17 2003 Mathes, Valerie Sherer. The Standing Bear controversy : prelude to Indian reform.

E99.P7 S836 2013  Sneve, Virginia Driving Hawk. Standing Bear of the Ponca.

KF228.S78 T5  Tibbles, Thomas Henry. The Ponca chiefs;  an account of the trial of Standing Bear. Edited with an introd. by Kay Graber.

KF228.S78 T54 1995  Tibbles, Thomas Henry, 1840-1928. Standing Bear and the Ponca Chiefs.

E77 .V59 2019  Vizenor, Gerald Robert.  Native provenance : the betrayal of cultural creativity.

Thomas Henry Tibbles Papers “Standing Bear vs. Crook: Argument of G.M. Lambertson, 1879” (Box 2, Folder 07).

Comments (5)

  1. Standing bear won his case and him and his people were freed after Standing bear v crook I am personally glad the constitution came into play with standing bears rights.

  2. If anyone knows, did the government seek to appeal and the Supreme Court decline to hear the case, or did the government refrain from seeking appeal? Thank you.

    • Hello, per the court report, there’s a note at the report’s conclusion:
      “NOTE. At the May term, 1879, Mr. Justice Miller refused to hear an appeal prosecuted by the United States, because the Indians who had petitioned for the writ of habeas corpus were not present, having been released by the order of Dundy, J. [District Judge], and no security for their appearance having been taken.”
      * Source:
      KF117 8th .D55 1871 Cases Determined in the United States Circuit Courts for the Eighth Circuit
      Reported by John Dillon, The Circuit Judge.
      Volume 5
      Davenport, Iowa: Egbert, Fidlar, & Chambers. 1880

      Thanks for asking… Jennifer

  3. Standing bear finally got to burry his son. its messed up that it had to be so hard on him.

  4. The U.S was in the wrong.

Add a Comment

This blog is governed by the general rules of respectful civil discourse. You are fully responsible for everything that you post. The content of all comments is released into the public domain unless clearly stated otherwise. The Library of Congress does not control the content posted. Nevertheless, the Library of Congress may monitor any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove content for any reason whatever, without consent. Gratuitous links to sites are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on the Library site. Read our Comment and Posting Policy.

Required fields are indicated with an * asterisk.