Top of page

General James Wilkinson, the Spanish Spy Who was a Senior Officer in the U.S. Army During Four Presidential Administrations

Share this post:

To celebrate National Library Week during this time of social distancing, we encourage you to explore the collections of the Library of Congress online. One of the great things about exploring the collections of the Library of Congress is its ability to surprise you. In that spirit, I wanted to share something I came across in the digital collections of our Manuscripts Division. You are looking at a drawing of a rock carving that was sent to Thomas Jefferson by General James Wilkinson, who served as a senior officer in the United States Army under Presidents Washington, Adams, Jefferson, and Madison. What is so interesting about finding an item written by Wilkinson is that he was later revealed to be Agent 13, a spy selling secrets of the United States to the Spanish crown.

James Wilkinson, 1802, with Drawings of Indian Rock, Ohio River. From the Thomas Jefferson Papers collection in the Library of Congress Manuscripts Division.
James Wilkinson (to Thomas Jefferson), with Drawings of Indian Rock, Ohio River. 1802. Manuscript/Mixed Material. From the Thomas Jefferson Papers collection in the Library of Congress Manuscripts Division. http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/mtj.mtjbib012040 

President Theodore Roosevelt later described Wilkinson as follows: “In all our history, there has been no more despicable character.” Wilkinson was under suspicion of being a “Spanish pensioner” throughout his life. Born in Charles County, Maryland, Wilkinson trained as a medical doctor, but soon found his calling as a soldier during the Revolutionary War.

Chronically short of money due to his lavish spending, Wilkinson sought to supplement his income by becoming a spy for the Spanish. Wilkinson’s early efforts focused on an attempt to separate Kentucky and Tennessee from the United States to deliver them to Spain. Wilkinson also informed the Spanish about the Lewis and Clark expedition (Linklater, p. 208). Though the Spanish did not manage to locate them, one can imagine that if the Spanish did catch up with them, Lewis and Clark would have simply disappeared. Wilkinson’s information also helped the Spanish delay the annexation of Texas by the United States (Linklater, p. 236).

James Wilkinson, head-and-shoulders portrait, right profile. Saint-Mémin, Charles Balthazar Julien Fevret. Engraving. Richmond: 1808
James Wilkinson, head-and-shoulders portrait, right profile. Saint-Mémin, Charles Balthazar Julien Fevret. Engraving. Richmond: 1808. Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division. //hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/pga.13215.

Wilkinson was very nearly caught on two occasions. In order to pay Wilkinson, the Spanish floated coins hidden in coffee and sugar barrels up the Mississippi and Ohio Rivers (Linklater, p. 155). The Spanish-speaking boatmen figured out that there were coins hidden in the barrels, murdered the courier, and spread out across the Kentucky countryside. After they were apprehended, they were brought before a magistrate in Frankfort, Kentucky. The magistrate sent for an interpreter named Thomas Power, who unfortunately for the boatmen, was also a Spanish spy (Linklater, p. 146). When the magistrate asked the boatmen to account for themselves, they responded by explaining to Power that the coins were a payment for Wilkinson from the Spanish crown. Power “interpreted” their testimony by explaining to the magistrate that the men stated they had committed a cold blooded murder and were motivated by greed. As a result, one of the boatmen was hung, and Wilkinson was spared.

Wilkinson was also nearly identified as a key participant in the Aaron Burr conspiracy. Burr’s precise objective is still unclear, ranging from an attempt to separate the West from the United States to a plot to depose President Jefferson, but what is clear is that Wilkinson became nervous that Burr’s conspiracy would fail, and sought to minimize the appearance of his involvement and portray himself as a savior of the Republic to Jefferson. In order to minimize the appearance of his own involvement in the conspiracy, Wilkinson doctored a ciphered letter that implicated Burr and then turned that letter over to the Jefferson administration. Wilkinson’s sanctimonious attitude at Burr’s trial rankled one observer who described him, based on his considerable girth and garish uniform of his own design, as a “mammoth of iniquity.”

Despite widespread suspicions about his loyalties, how did Wilkinson retain his position? First, Wilkinson was an effective military commander, but also federal administrations in the early United States feared that if they did not command the loyalty of the army, it could threaten to depose them. Wilkinson’s ability to control the army, and maintain its loyalty to democratic, civilian institutions, made him a valuable asset despite the cloud of suspicion that hovered above him (Linklater, p. 195).

One such demonstration of Wilkinson’s loyalty to the authority of the civilian government was illustrated by banning the queue hairstyle in the army. This hairstyle (which looks something like a braided pig tail that is greased with flour and lard, if you are looking for a new look) was popular among members of the army as a signal that they were warriors. It also become associated as a sign of partisan loyalty to the Federalists. After Jefferson took office, Wilkinson sought to ingratiate himself by issuing a controversial order that banned the queue in the army (Wilkinson, p. 501). This was met with resistance by a Revolutionary Army hero named Colonel Thomas Butler who resisted the order to the point of facing a court martial (Wilkinson, p. 501). While he awaited punishment for his defiance, Butler died of yellow fever in New Orleans (Wilkinson, p. 512). Supposedly, Butler wrote in his will: “Bore a hole through the bottom of my coffin, right under my head, and let my queue hang through it, that the damned old rascal will see that, even when dead, I refuse to obey his (Wilkinson’s) orders” (Linklater, p. 355).

In 1854, long after Wilkinson’s death,  letters were discovered in a Spanish archive that confirmed Wilkinson had indeed been a spy operating on behalf of the Spanish crown, leading to the description of him as an “Artist in Treason.”

A subtle reminder of Wilkinson’s questionable legacy can still be observed while driving through Frankfort, the capital of Kentucky, where Wilkinson laid out the grid for many of the early streets. Wilkinson brazenly named one of those streets for a Spanish governor who was paying him, Mero Street (the correct spelling of the governor’s name is Miro), which intersects with Wilkinson Boulevard.

Sources:

Andro Linklater. “An Artist in Treason” (2009).

James Wilkinson. Colonel Thomas Butler and General Wilkinson’s “Roundhead Order.” The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography Vol. 17, No. 4 (1893), pp. 501-512.

Comments (7)

  1. Another interesting publication in the Rare Books Collection of the Law Library of Congress that ties into General James Wilkinson is the three volume set of “The Trial of Colonel Aaron Burr on an Indictment for Treason” published in 1807-1808. Nathan Dorn, LLC Rare Books Curator, details the connection between Burr and Wilkinson in the YouTube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vIUbGV595bk

  2. I am looking for information on the date and names of the Spanish couriers that were killed bringing hidden money to Wilkinson. I am looking for the reference Linklater, pg 155.
    Thank you

  3. What was the answer to your question regarding names of Spanish couriers.

    • Hi Carolyn,

      Unfortunately, I do not think Linklater names the couriers. You could check with the KY State Archives to see if they have a record of this hearing, which occurred in Frankfort.

      Best,
      Robert

  4. Why wasn’t Wilkinson called to testify at Aaron Burr’s trial?

    • Hello. Thanks for your question. Would you please send your question to our Ask A Librarian Service so it can be assigned to a reference librarian? https://ask.loc.gov/

  5. That Wilkinson lasted 4 administrations without the first 4 presidents’ knowledge, is asking the student of history to ignore more than those illustrious Founding Fathers did. When are American historians going to grow up and acknowledge the very crafty and usefulness of Wilkinson’s double agency? Washington, Adams, Jefferson and Madison knew who and what Wilkinson was and “wink, wink, nudge, nudge” so did many others. The real question is, what did all four presidents gain, keeping Wilkinson in a position of strategic intelligence and power? That has never been thoroughly addressed.

    Painting Wilkinson as a scoundrel and rogue without the acknowledgement that his conspiratorial agency was useful in many ways is revealing. To let US, as in United States think that the mythos of our Founding Fathers’ purity and integrity is beyond question, only continues to keep America dumb. Apparently this is still too tough to handle for too many.

    If each of those 4 presidents was willing to ignore Wilkinson’s critics and despite them, still empowered him, what can of worms does that open when investigating each of them? Wilkinson was not a useful idiot. He was strategically important to them all. The terms and conditions of Wilkinson’s power are not explored fairly at all. Our nation’s history is still being edited and revised and Wilkinson, despite his detractors was a lot of things but he was not a fool.

    The story of our nation’s history and its founding is still being written. To pretend that Wilkinson did not effectively serve the first four presidents’ master plan is stretching our understanding of politics and human nature. If history is to be told, then, “You can’t handle the truth” needs to be repeated again and again, not only by those but also to those who write history.
    It’s easier to indict The Spy Wilkinson, and double agent, rather than take a deeper dive into who was in control, and who benefitted than to exonerate him. To excuse Wilkinson would require looking very carefully at the ways he effectively served each of the Founding Four presidents.
    Risking the idea that the crafters of our nation were aware, compliant and -heaven forbid! tacitly gave Wilkinson permission, may be too-hot-to-handle history. It’s going on 250 years now. It’s obvious to me, Wilkinson was, to all four, a calculated risk. Regardless of how anyone treats Wilkinson’s legacy, the founding fathers bet on Wilkinson, and they all won. On top of that, Aaron Burr was an undeniable traitor and scoundrel. It was because of Wilkinson, he was undone.

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *