{ subscribe_url: '/share/sites/library-of-congress-blogs/law.php' }

United Nations Day – A Time to Reflect on the Potential Role of the International Court of Justice

This is a guest post by Elizabeth Boomer, an international law consultant in the Global Legal Research Directorate. Elizabeth has previously written for In Custodia Legis on Technology & the Law of Corporate Responsibility – The Impact of Blockchain, and the 30th Anniversary of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child

ICJ Holds Public Hearings on Equatorial Guinea v. France Case, (Feb. 17, 2020), by UN/Frank van Beek.

Tomorrow, October 24, is United Nations Day (UN Day), which marks the 75th anniversary of the creation of the United Nations. The focus of UN Day 2020 is “The future we want, the United Nations we need: reaffirming our collective commitment to multilateralism,” which is particularly pertinent given the scope of collective action challenges confronting the multilateral system today. These include how international law can be used to respond to the legal challenges presented by COVID-19, to resolve ongoing trade wars, to manage migration flows, or to address climate change (which was the theme of UN Day 2019). While these challenges may be most commonly handled through diplomacy or advocacy, one might wonder what international law tools and institutions the UN has as part of its arsenal to contribute to the future we want.

In this post, I want to highlight the potential of the advisory opinion function of the International Court of Justice (ICJ), as a main organ of the UN. Article 33 of the United Nations Charter established the ICJ in 1945, and its governing statute was annexed to the UN Charter in 1945. As the ICJ notes, “Despite having no binding force, the Court’s advisory opinions nevertheless carry great legal weight and moral authority. They are often an instrument of preventive diplomacy and help to keep the peace. In their own way, advisory opinions also contribute to the clarification and development of international law and thereby to the strengthening of peaceful relations between States.”

While the idea of creating an international court to settle disputes between states and to offer advisory opinions may seem mostly uncontroversial now, an international court was not an obvious choice for an international legal institution in the early 1940s. Prior to the establishment of the ICJ as a principle organ of the UN, mediation and arbitration were the much more common methods for the pacific settlement of disputes between states. Among its predecessors, only the Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ) functioned as an international court in a non-ad hoc manner, as opposed to an arbitral tribunal. These characteristics allowed the PCIJ to have the competency to not only settle specific disputes between parties, but also to provide advisory opinions on any question referred to it by the Council or Assembly of the League of Nations. However, the PCIJ was short lived, only operating and delivering judgments for 19 years from 1921 to 1940. Thus, the creation of a new international court capable of giving advisory opinions was not a foregone conclusion.

However in the end, the committee charged with drafting the statute of the new international court decided to base it primarily on the statute of the PCIJ – many of the first judges of the ICJ were former judges of the PCIJ. One important characteristic the ICJ carried over from the PCIJ is that the court’s jurisdiction is not compulsory (an exploration of the issues of state consent and compulsory jurisdiction can be found here).

To date, the ICJ has delivered 133 judgments in contentious disputes between states and 28 advisory opinions. Currently, 15 contentious cases are pending before the court. While contentious cases have represented the majority of proceedings at the ICJ in recent years, one might wonder if the ICJ’s advisory proceedings could offer some clarity at the international level on the array of international legal issues that the COVID-19 pandemic has either caused or exacerbated? Per article 65 of the Statute of the ICJ, “the Court may give an advisory opinion on any legal question at the request of whatever body may be authorized by or in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations to make such a request”. Furthermore, article 96 of the UN Charter provides that, in addition to the UN General Assembly and the Security Council, other UN organs and specialized agencies may request advisory opinions on legal questions arising within the scope of their activities, if authorized by the General Assembly.

Some relevant international legal issues the ICJ may be asked to clarify are: (i) what are the international obligations of states during a pandemic, and when do these obligations arise; (ii) the ways that states should balance overlapping, and sometimes contradictory, international human rights obligations, such as national security and protection of public health vs. freedoms of expression, association, or privacy during a pandemic, or (iii) what defenses to state responsibility could be invoked due to the pandemic?

While it remains to be seen if the General Assembly, Security Council, or other UN organs and specialized agencies will request an advisory opinion from the ICJ on any of these or other legal issues mentioned, it is clear that the commitment to multilateralism through the peaceful settlement of disputes and the hope to strengthen peaceful relations between states remains a priority 75 years later.

70th Anniversary of the German Federal Court of Justice

This month, the German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof, BGH)—Germany’s supreme court for civil and criminal cases—is celebrating its 70th anniversary. It was established on October 1, 1950, and immediately started hearing cases as it took over the case files from the German Supreme Court for the British Zone (Oberster Gerichtshof für die Britische Zone, […]

New Report Examines Restrictions on Freedom of Expression during COVID-19 in Select Jurisdictions

The permeation of misinformation and disinformation relating to any conceivable issue, particularly on social media platforms, is rampant. This problem has become particularly acute with the advent of the COVID-19 global pandemic. A policy document issued by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OCED) described the ubiquity of false information and the challenge it presents in […]

100 Year Anniversary of the Austrian Constitution

Unlike most countries, Austria does not have just one constitutional document, like the Constitution of the United States for example, but several documents that have constitutional status. Of these documents, the most important one is the Austrian Federal Constitutional Law (Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz). It was adopted by the Constituent National Assembly on October 1, 1920—100 years ago today—and entered into force […]

New Report Examines the Regulation of the Sale of Wild Animals and Their Meat in Markets Around the World

When a novel coronavirus was first reported as having been contracted by people in Wuhan, China, in  December 2019, there was a lot of discussion about the potential source of the virus. On January 12, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) released a statement saying that “[t]he evidence is highly suggestive that the outbreak is […]

Join Us on September 24 for a Foreign and Comparative Law Webinar on “Worlds Apart: Legal Responses to COVID-19 in New Zealand and Sweden”

Please join us for the Law Library’s upcoming webinar: “Worlds Apart: Legal Responses to COVID-19 in New Zealand and Sweden” at 2 p.m. EDT on Thursday, September 24, 2020. This webinar is the latest installment in the Law Library’s series of webinars focused on foreign and comparative law. In this webinar, we will discuss and compare the overarching policies and approaches of the two countries, outline the relevant laws, and a look at how the two governments have communicated with the public about the pandemic and the approaches taken.

“Justice Dogs” in Germany

Are you looking for a legitimate reason to browse adorable dog pictures at work? Well, this blog post might just be what you were looking for! In December 2019, the Golden Retriever “Watson” started his work as a “justice dog” in the German state of Baden-Württemberg as part of a pilot project. Justice dogs are trained […]

Einstein’s Fateful Letter

Between July 18 and August 15, 1939, one of the most consequential letters in modern history was drafted by Albert Einstein and the Hungarian-born physicist Leo Szilard. The letter, which was eventually delivered to President Franklin Roosevelt,led to the Manhattan Project and the development of the first two atomic weapons. Szilard and two other Hungarian-born physicists, […]