Top of page

A Stradivari Good Copy

Share this post:

To say that a violin made by master luthier Antonio Stradivari (1644 – Dec. 18, 1737) is priceless is an understatement. His are some of the finest stringed instruments ever made, often selling for several million dollars – that is, when they are lucky enough to be found and put on the market. Of the estimated 1,000 violins Stradivari made, there are only about 650 still in existence. The Library has three of them (and a few violas and violoncellos he also made).

Violin by Antonio Stradivari, Cremona, 1704, “Betts” / Michael Zirkle

People have been copying these and other Stradavari instruments almost ever since they were first produced. And, while owning an original may be unattainable, thanks to some cool science, getting your hands on a pretty spot-on copy could be well within reach.

Minnesota radiologist Steven Sirr, along with violin makers John Waddle and Steve Rossow, have conceived a way to replicate a Stradivarius through CT scans. Using computed tomography (CT) imaging and advanced manufacturing techniques, they recently built a reproduction of one of the Library’s Strad violins – the “Betts,” dated 1704. Their goal was to “understand how the violin works” and to make reproductions available to “young musicians who can’t afford an original.”

Metallic aura scan of “Betts” violin / Steven Sirr

 

More than 1,000 CT scan images of the “Betts” were produced and then converted to a program that instructs a machine to replicate those elements. Then, Waddle and Rossow finished, assembled and varnished the replica by hand. What resulted was an instrument with a sound quality very similar to an original Strad, according to Sirr, who is also an amateur violinist.

Scan of front detail of “Betts” violin / Steven Sirr

This isn’t the first time Library strings, including the “Betts,” have been scanned. Through a project with the Smithsonian Institution, Bruno Frohlich, a research anthropologist with the Museum of Natural History, has scanned nearly 50 violins and other stringed instruments – by Stradivari, his peers and today’s artisans – to study their anatomy of design and hopefully uncover that elusive sound secret.

Comments (15)

  1. With all the talk of hightec
    No one can make a good copy
    How did Stradivari make it
    The glue and wood and strings.
    Did anyone check on the brass and steel back then.
    They must have different amount of copper, etc.etc.
    The wood was old before too.

  2. Duplicating the soul of harmonics of tree wood exactly is not possible it seems. Admirable try though.

  3. This is very cool. Thanks! Any plans for a concert featuring the original and the copy?

    • Actually the Library regularly holds concerts featuring our historical string instruments. In fact, this past Saturday (Dec. 17), the Borromeo Quartet played our Strads in the Library’s annual Stradivari memorial concert. I don’t know that we have any plans to do a side-by-side concert with the “Betts” and this replica. You may find this article interesting. Nicholas Kitchen of the Borromeo Quartet actually compared the sound of five of the Library’s violins, including the “Betts.”

  4. Thank you for this very interesting article on violin design.

    Are such replications available for sale ? If so, where and how much ?

  5. How do you get a stradivari priced or to check to see if it the real thing???

  6. This is fascinating! Nothing sounds as beautiful as a Stradivarius, and it’s interesting to see that some people are REALLY into the science behind it all too 🙂

  7. @Bob Herrmann:

    A violinist changes his/her strings regularly. They are useless after several months, or for some violinists less, depending on string quality and playing frequency. There are certainly no strings still played on after centuries!

  8. You may carbon copy the structure. But you cannot duplicate the sound it produces. that is the secret .
    Cheers

  9. What most people forget is that the Strads (Amatis, etc) were all made as Baroque violins, and played that way for quite some time before being taken apart and modified.

  10. Interesting idea in a lab,but for violin makers to partake?, come on man …Human CREATIVITY !. Are you guys that desperate!. A bit disrespectful to Stradivari wouldn’t you think!. What’s next a computer that can paint like Rembrandt, or a computer that can write music? or great novels , what’s even more crazy is, violin makers them selves, trying to do this, and then people buying into it$$?.
    Living breathing artists of any craft shouldn’t be compared or contested bye any computer its sad and disgraceful. Genius creativity created bye a living breathing organism with a SOUL is something way beyond any computer. And one should of course stop to think if one should ?, Dont get me wrong I love computers, but Step back and look”and see how all of this Looks ! Cheep!.

  11. One makes a Violin and in the process a part of himself is implanted into his work.One hears the machine in such computerized modelling .

  12. If these are instruments in a tax payer facility, then I would like to see th E C.A.D. files. Seeing as I am a tax payer.

  13. Will any of the data from such scans be made public?

    • Hi there,

      I sent your question to Carol Ward-Bamford, one of our music specialists. Here’s her reply:

      The scans done by Bruno Frolich and the Library at the SI were first made available to the public on the SI website. More recently they have been removed during website upgrades, and will be made available on the Library’s website when staff can return to work and resume normal operating service.

      Hope that helps!
      -Neely

Add a Comment

This blog is governed by the general rules of respectful civil discourse. You are fully responsible for everything that you post. The content of all comments is released into the public domain unless clearly stated otherwise. The Library of Congress does not control the content posted. Nevertheless, the Library of Congress may monitor any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove content for any reason whatever, without consent. Gratuitous links to sites are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on the Library site. Read our Comment and Posting Policy.


Required fields are indicated with an * asterisk.