Charles Manson and “Once Upon a Time….in Hollywood”

Manson on trial in Los Angeles. Sketch: William Robles. Thomas V. Girardi collection, Prints & Photographs Division.

This story is adapted from an upcoming issue of the Library of Congress Magazine.

Charles Manson scarcely appears in “Once Upon a Time…in Hollywood,” the new Quentin Tarantino film. But the Manson family’s murderous home invasions on the nights of Aug. 8 and 9, 1969, give the film its narrative tension, and Manson’s aura hangs over the entire film, as it should. The story of his band of hippies turned killers – mostly wayward young women with a penchant for drugs, sex and knives – has transfixed the nation for half a century, in a way that few other crimes ever have.

The slayings – seven people were butchered, including actress Sharon Tate, who was eight and a half months pregnant — were a horror show that brought the excesses of the decade into glittering focus. The nation, transfixed, looked at the killings and saw the larger society unraveling. Hippies, drugs, guns, celebrity, violence, racism, counterculture revolution. It all blew up into the madness of a man who wanted to ignite an apocalyptic race war by killing rich white people and framing black people for it.

Front page of Los Angeles Times, Dec. 6, 1969, with headlines designed to generate street sales.

The Manson murders, Joan Didion famously wrote, ended the ‘60s. “Helter Skelter,” prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi’s frightening book about the killings, is still the bestselling true-crime book in U.S. history. All three of Manson’s female co-defendants were sentenced to death, likely the most women condemned to die in one incident in North American jurisprudence since the Salem witch trials in 1692. (All five death sentences in the case, including Manson’s, were later commuted to life in prison following a U.S. Supreme Court decision.)

Sharon Tate, on the cover of Look magazine, Sept. 5, 1967. Look Collection, Prints & Photographs Division.

As the number of books, pop songs, films, documentaries and based-on novels  blossomed over the years, Manson became the primogenitor of the “killer with something to say” trope, the idea that there’s this darkly intelligent madman who’s onto something about the quivering underbelly of the American dream. Like he was the Joker from Batman, brought to life. Reporters flocked to his jail cell for interviews. He was profiled on the cover of Rolling Stone in a 30,000-word story that dubbed him “the most dangerous man alive.” His image — greasy black hair, grungy beard, the “X” he cut into his forehead before his trial — was emblazoned on T-shirts and posters. Guns N’ Roses recorded one of his songs. Trent Reznor of Nine Inch Nails made a music video in the house where Manson’s followers killed Tate and her friends. Rocker Marilyn Manson used the killer for half of his stage name.

“I am what you made of me and the mad dog devil killer fiend leper is a reflection of your society,” Manson said after his conviction. “Whatever the outcome of this madness that you call a fair trial or Christian justice, you can know this: In my mind’s eye my thoughts light fires in your cities.”

He died in prison in 2017, at age 83.

Manson’s hold on the national imagination is preserved in the Library in several ways – courtroom sketches, books, newspaper archives, recordings – the most notable of which is the iconic drawing by the legendary courtroom artist William Robles. Robles spent every day of the nine-month trial sitting a few feet away from Manson, who, as he remembers, “terrified people.” Once, when Robles accidentally knocked over his sketching materials, making a clatter, he looked up to see Manson suppressing a giggle, playfully running one index finger down the other: The “shame on you” gesture.

“I could see how people were attracted to him,” Robles said in a recent interview. “He had an appeal, a warmth.”

It’s not as crazy a contradiction as it sounds.

Since the dawn of civilization, human beings have killed one another, often for reasons that can neither be clearly articulated nor understood, and this violent mystery goes to the heart of human nature. Who are we? What are our ultimate taboos, and how do we respond when these are violated? Crime, writ small or large, can therefore become a shorthand, a brutal slash of insight, into the society that spawns it.

The first lines of Homer’s “The Iliad” — the foundational epic of Western literature, composed about 2,800 years ago – describe the murderous “anger of Achilles” that sent many a brave soul “hurrying down to Hades.” The biblical Book of Genesis, another cornerstone of Western culture, says that when the population of the Earth was four, Cain killed Abel, reducing it to three.

The Library’s holdings on the meanings of murder range from ancient manuscripts to Wild West ballads to most everything in between. Some of these reflect the low arts of the “penny bloods,” the wildly popular Victorian-era serial stories that presaged today’s tabloids. Others achieve the status of high art, such as Truman Capote’s “In Cold Blood,” the 1966 story of a multiple murder in Kansas that helped create the true-crime-as-literature-and-social-commentary genre.

Harry Truman, then a U.S. Senator from Missouri, lets U.S. Vice President John Nance Garner handle Jesse James’ guns. Feb. 17, 1938. Photo: Harris & Ewing. Prints & Photographs Division.

The roots of this run deep in the American bloodstream. After the Civil War, the “Wild West” became a mythological landscape, a place where murder, blood and cruelty became a romantic notion. Jesse James, a Missouri-born bank robber and killer, became a cultural icon. Nearly a century after James was gunned down, President Harry Truman, a fellow Missourian, acquired his pistols and playfully posed with them – murder weapons as presidential guffaws.

“It’s always been an American theme to make heroes out of the criminals,” Johnny Cash, who himself made a career from songs of outlaws and prisons, told Rolling Stone in 2000. “Right or wrong, we’ve always done it.”

But it was only after Capote’s lyrical tale of murder in rural Kansas that Americans began seeing nonfiction literature and serious art as appropriate forums with which to address the nation’s violent culture without the gauze of fiction. The “New Journalism” Capote and others practiced on crime reporting became so influential that, today, we take it for granted. Pulitzer Prizes, National Book Awards, Academy Awards – all have all been given to tales of true crime. In 2016, ESPN Films described “O.J.: Made in America,” its Academy Award-winning, eight-hour documentary about the 1990s O.J. Simpson murder trial as “the defining cultural tale of modern America – a saga of race, celebrity, media, violence, and the criminal justice system.”

They might well have been describing the Manson case half a century earlier. Robert Kirsch, the L.A. Times book editor, reviewing “Helter Skelter” upon publication, seized on the crime’s significance. The book, and others like it, he wrote, were attempting to understand the frightening era in which they were living: “To accept these (killings) as simply symptoms of the malaise of the times,” he wrote, “is to abandon the obligations of civilization to rationally address even the most irrational and fearful events.”

Subscribe to the blog— it’s free! — and the largest library in world history will send cool stories straight to your inbox.

12 Comments

  1. Peter Dizozza
    July 25, 2019 at 11:02 am

    wow, can you also restore your original post on this subject?

  2. Neely Tucker
    July 25, 2019 at 11:20 am

    Hi Peter,

    An early draft of a different story on Manson was inadvertently posted for a few minutes yesterday, if that’s what you’re referring to, but it was taken down. It was not intended to be published.

    Cheers,
    Neely

  3. Matt
    July 25, 2019 at 11:54 am

    It’s interesting how the My Lai massacre and the Tate-LaBianca murders are both front page stories in that newspaper clipping you posted, yet the results of the trials and the response of the public is so different. In the one case, Lt. Calley and his men killed 22 villagers, but only Calley was punished, serving just 3 years house arrest before his sentence was commuted. It’s as if the horror is mitigated by distance, the foreignness of the environment, the war, the fact that Calley and his men were in uniform. For all the gruesomeness and lurid details of the Manson Family murders, these were clearly insane people who were, rightly, punished to the fullest extent of the law. But because the Tate-LaBianca murders happened to Americans, in an American city in an American home, somehow that makes the murders more horrific and more nightmarish to people? It really doesn’t make a lot of sense.

  4. Neely Tucker
    July 25, 2019 at 12:52 pm

    Hi Matt,
    Wasn’t that an amazing front page, My Lai and Manson on the same day? And yes, the public attention to crimes/homicides varies greatly and doesn’t follow any logical pattern. Manson, as he always pointed out, never actually killed anyone (at least that weekend) and was convicted of a total number of nine murders. Jim Jones convinced 900 people in his Peoples Temple to kill themselves or others…and yet it’s Manson who is remembered as the face of modern evil.

    Best,
    Neely

  5. Matthew
    July 25, 2019 at 1:26 pm

    I just want to point out that while it is true that Trent Reznor did film a video in that house, at the time it was actually his own home. He’s always been insistent that he didn’t know about the history of the home and he moved out about a year after buying it saying “there was too much history in that house for me to handle.”

  6. Martha Aleo
    July 25, 2019 at 8:00 pm

    Matt, the clipping pictured does not contain a story about the LaBianca murders. At least not the portion that can be seen. What is does contain is a story about the 1968 Hue Massacre.

  7. Bonnie Belza
    July 26, 2019 at 12:36 pm

    Interesting contrast to first draft posted earlier. Reveals creative process and raw thinking of author. Huge difference in quality and content

  8. Neely Tucker
    July 26, 2019 at 1:58 pm

    Hi Bonnie,

    The “first draft” was an inadvertently published set of notes for a version of the story that highlighted some of the bizarre facts about the Manson investigation/trial…but, sure, I hope it got better as it went along!

    Cheers,
    Neely

  9. Rebecca Vaughn
    July 28, 2019 at 7:33 am

    I usually deflect from anything Manson, anything Tarrantino, and avoid movies and books such as those mentioned. They terrify me. Man’s pure evil perplexes and saddens me. Yet, I read all of this piece since it was posted on this reputable site. Good job…very thought-provoking and well written.

  10. Neely Tucker
    July 29, 2019 at 8:49 am

    Hi Rebecca,

    Thank you! You might want to look for our “True Crime” issue of the LOC Magazine, coming out in September, from which this article was adapted.

    Best,
    Neely

  11. Jozef Jhon
    August 2, 2019 at 7:52 am

    Thank you Very much

  12. Felix
    August 18, 2019 at 3:13 am

    Only in america

Add a Comment

This blog is governed by the general rules of respectful civil discourse. You are fully responsible for everything that you post. The content of all comments is released into the public domain unless clearly stated otherwise. The Library of Congress does not control the content posted. Nevertheless, the Library of Congress may monitor any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove content for any reason whatever, without consent. Gratuitous links to sites are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on the Library site. Read our Comment and Posting Policy.

Required fields are indicated with an * asterisk.