Top of page

Part two with the 1920s behind
Our anniversary logo with the Library Bindery taken between 1910 and 1930. Credit: Chantel Martin, 2025. Underwood and Underwood, Prints and Photographs Collection, Library of Congress, ca. 1910 to 1930. https://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/96504178/

125 years of binding, Part Two: The Library Binding Branch

Share this post:

This is part two of a four-part series. Part one covers the period prior to 1900.

Just months after Congressional approval was granted, the machines whirred to life in the new Binding Office at the Library of Congress. Officially known as the Library Branch of the Government Printing Office (GPO), a staff of three from the Library worked with 40 plus staff members from the GPO. As they awaited the equipment, the Library began reassigning staff and preparing more for binding requests from the various divisions.

When what is now known as the Thomas Jefferson Building opened in 1897, the Library of Congress took on a substantial increase in staff. Librarians were sought from throughout the world to help establish new offices, to better serve the new reading rooms, and to prepare and store the collection. Though it took three years for Congress to approve the creation of a binding office, the groundwork began earlier that year before the building opened its doors that fall.

Frederick W. Hebard was hired in 1897 as a stack attendant from Union, NJ. Within two years, according to the Official Register of the United States, he had moved up to assistant in the Catalogue Department. His remit was to determine the needs of a Binding Office for the Library, and he would be officially named the first assistant in charge of binding at the Library of Congress in April 1900.

First binding chief with the first binding report
The first annual report of the new binding office, with Left: memorandum signed by chief F.W. Hebard, Credit: Binding Division annual report, 1900, Central File series, LC Archives, 2025. Center: Photograph of Hebard with the faculty of Whitesboro High School, 1910. Credit: Whitesboro Central Alumni: 80th Anniversary 1892-1972, New York Heritage Digital Collections, https://nyheritage.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/p16694coll38/id/8297/rec/2. Right: the report in its final form in the Librarian’s Annual Report. Credit: Library of Congress Annual Report for 1900.  Hathi Trust, 2023. https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.a0005540182&seq=7

 

At the same time that Hebard joined the Library, Arthur Richmond Kimball was recruited from the New Hampshire State Library. Initially hired as an assistant librarian, he was given responsibility to create an Order division, today known as Acquisitions, and was appointed its first Chief in 1899, five months before it was approved in the spending bill.

Hebard would leave in 1901 to become a high school principal. With Hebard gone, Librarian Herbert Putnam shuffled several staff around to find the right person to be the assistant in charge. Kimball took over in 1902 but was also assigned to the Periodical Division, the position being only part of his duties for several years with Lucretia Waring briefly serving in the role alongside him due to a salary limitation. Kimball took it on fully once the salary was raised to match his annual wage of $1500 in 1907. He would hold the position for the next 25 years and set many of the standards and policies we still follow today

The early faces of library binding
From left to right: Robert K. Shaw, second chief of the binding office, 1901; Lucretia C. Waring, co-chief of the office, 1905-1906; Arthur R. Kimball, 1902-1932 (back row, second from left) pictured with Librarian Herbert Putnam (front row, center) and other Library officials in 1914. Image Credits: Twenty-fifth anniversary report, 1894-1919, Harvard University, 1919. Hathi Trust, 2025. https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=hvd.32044107299869&seq=546&view=1up; Courtesy of Fred Waring, c.1900; Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Collection, 1914. https://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2012648876/.

 

When the Government Printing Office opened its binding branch at the Library of Congress, the materials that could be used were prescribed by law. For Library of Congress collections, they were to use half turkey, which is goat leather imported from Türkiye covering the spine of the book and the corners of the front and back covers. As binding frequency increased, and sensibilities changed, the binding process improved and modernized. Additionally, librarians worldwide found their bindings were deteriorating.

In London, UK, the Committee of the Society of Arts on Leather for Bookbinding was gathered in 1905. In their final report, which was cited in several annual reports of the Library, they assessed the present state of bookbinding and found the materials were lacking. The leather was less durable, modern bookbinding techniques weakened it further, and the books were overall not well preserved. “With proper conditions of ventilation, temperature, and dryness, books may be preserved without deterioration for very long periods, on open shelves,” the report stated.

Not the best read
Images and examples from the report of the Committee on Leather For Bookbinding, which met in London in 1905. Report of the Committee on leather for bookbinding, Royal society of arts, 1905. http://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/001161582

 

No one from the Library of Congress was included on the committee, nor from the Government Printing Office, despite both organizations’ rise in notability. Throughout the 19th Century, the United States hosted several expositions to gather inventors, artists, entrepreneurs, and others to show advances in their fields. At the Lewis and Clark Centennial Exposition in St. Louis, MO, in 1904, the Library and the GPO had created displays for the first time.

pictures and text from the 1904 exposition in St. Louis
The 1904 Lewis & Clark Exposition, From left to right: A photograph of the government building at the Exposition, the plan of the Library display, the submitted items from the binding office, and the display itself with the binding section obscured. Credits: Keystone View Company, 1904. Prints & Photographs Division, Library of Congress. https://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2013647909/; Library of Congress Annual Report, 1904. Hathi Trust, 2024. https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015036944950&seq=1

 

Though included, the binding office display was not well noted. Attendees from the International Brotherhood of Bookbinders made no mention of the Library’s display in an article reviewing the expo in their journal, the International Bookbinder. When it came time for the Jamestown Centennial Exposition in 1907, the Library was allocated only $5,000 for the display, far less than 1904 and not enough to allow transport of collections items to Hampton Roads, VA. Instead of exhibiting collection items, the Library built the collection on the work of the staff, showing off tools and items that could be displayed within budget.

more artistic view of Hampton Roads
The 1907 Jamestown Exposition, From left to right: a photograph of the government building at the Exposition, a map of the exposition grounds, a copy of the pamphlet “Exhibit of Bookbinding,” and a drawing of the Library exhibit. Inset: a paragraph describing the binding items on display. Credit: Underwood & Underwood, 1907, Prints and Photographs Collection, Library of Congress. https://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2022648276/; Library of Congress Annual Report, 1907. Hathi Trust, 2023. https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015036944984&seq=111; William H. Lee, 1907. Theodore Roosevelt Center, 2020. https://www.theodorerooseveltcenter.org/Blog/Item/The%20Jamestown%20Exposition%20of%201907 Bindery: Letters, Reports, Etc., Library of Congress Archives, 2025; Final Report of the Jamestown Ter-Centennial Commission, S.Doc. 60-735, 1909. Government Publishing Office, 2024. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/SERIALSET-05403_00_00-002-0735-0000

 

Materials continued to be in flux as the new century moved forward. Kimball worked with the foremen of the bindery and the GPO’s head foremen to test out various binding materials and even the glue that was used. In 1907, the bindery started working with a stiff cotton material soaked in a sizing agent called buckram. The cost was more than regular cloth, but it showed promise. After the findings of the 1905 committee, it became necessary to care for the leather bindings, especially with those leathers that proved to be acidic.

swatches galore
Examples of materials for testing, From left to right: morroco leather from 1904, two different leather samples from 1909, acid-free leather from 1912, an acid-free morrocco leather from 1914, and buckram from 1933. Photo Credit: Binding Division, Keeper of the Collections and Associated Units, 1940-1963, Manuscript Division, 2025.

 

While the quality of the leather continued to degrade, the invention of Pyroxylin in 1910, a gelatinized nitrocellulouse, allowed buckram to become more stable, and lower in cost. From then on, the bindery began using it more and more, though other issues still persisted. As the collections continued to grow, some of those items required some special care other than binding before reaching the shelves, fumigation.

history repeats itself
An article from Washington, D.C.’s Evening Star from July 18, 1914, detailing how the collections must be cleaned by outside specialists and noting the work of Kimball and the binding office. Credit: Evening star. (Washington, D.C.), 18 July 1914. Chronicling America: Historic American Newspapers. Lib. of Congress. https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83045462/1914-07-18/ed-1/seq-33/

 

As World War I broke out in Europe, certain materials became more inaccessible, including leather from Türkiye, which at the time was part of the Ottoman Empire, one of the Central Powers in the war. By that time, all materials for the reading rooms had been switched over to buckram. However, special collections and items for Congress remained in leathers, now in different colors due to available stock. Other items also became unavailable, such as the marbled paper used in endpapers.

marbling in a time of war
The marbling used in the end paper became in short supply according to the memorandum from Kimball at left. An example, shown at center, had been imported from Germany, but was no longer available after World War I. A test marbling was examined before a different style of endpaper was chosen. Photo Credit: Binding Division, Keeper of the Collections and Associated Units, 1940-1963, Manuscript Division, 2025.

 

The strong partnership between the Library and the GPO allowed the bindery to keep working efficiently through the war years and the material shortages. While the binding budget remained below the Library’s needs, it was not for lack of material. In 1918, the Library bindery took over the newspaper binding and for the first time, all of the Library’s binding was done onsite. This would continue for several years as the budget was increased, but the space provided for the bindery became too small to operate in.

The original caption wasn't sure of a date, but there's a calendar on the wall in the first image
A collection of photos show the binding staff hard at work in January 1920, as evidenced by the calendar above the machine in the photo at left. In the center photo, a folded manuscript is sewn and finished. In the right photo, quality assurance of the bound items is completed by staff. Photo Credit: National Photo Company Collection, Library of Congress, 1920. https://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2016851391/

 

Between 1919 and 1932, the budget for binding had doubled and the binding office saw their annual output go from 26,621 items to 38,491, with all items being bound onsite. Unfortunately, this progress was stalled as the Great Depression caused changes in budget allocations; starting with cutbacks in staffing due to the Economy Act of 1932.

Arthur Richmond Kimball, the trendsetter
Arthur R. Kimball was forced to retire in 1932, shown at his desk in 1920 (center). His assistant, Frank L. Fadner, Jr., was asked to list all of the responsibilities of the Binding Assistant in Charge by Librarian Putnam (right). At left are the Evening Star article announcing Kimball’s hiring on September 1, 1897 (top), and the excerpt from the Librarian’s Annual Report on his departure (bottom left). Credit:; National Photo Company Collection, LOC, 1920 https://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2016851394/; Evening star. (Washington, D.C.), 01 Sept. 1897. Chronicling America: Historic American Newspapers. Lib. of Congress. https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83045462/1897-09-01/ed-1/seq-10/; Librarian’s Annual Report for 1932, Hathi Trust, 2023. https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015036844234&seq=7; Binding Division, Central File series, LC Archives Collection, Manuscript Division, 2025.

 

Under the Economy Act of 1932, any federal employee 70 years or older, depending on their position, faced compulsory retirement in order to open up jobs for younger workers. It was at this time that Kimball returned to New Hampshire and was replaced by George W. Morgan, who would hold the position for the next decade, while the bindery space became ever more cramped.

Packed in and working hard
From the final days in the Jefferson Building, March 1936, Library bindery staff review completed work (left) and sew bindings (center), while finishing work is done at the GPO Bindery (right). Photo Credit: Prints & Photographs Collection, Library of Congress, 1936.

 

Congress approved the construction of an annex to the Library of Congress on June 13, 1930, after the Library had completely filled in the eastern alcoves with book storage. Once the plans were drawn, it was determined the Binding office would be moving across the street.

And then there were two
The Library Annex, today known as the John Adams Building, was constructed between 1930 and 1939 on the block directly behind the Library’s building, adjacent to the Folger Shakespeare Library, shown overhead at left. At right is the plan for the basement floor of the Annex including the binding office. Credit: Photographer unknown, Capitol Hill, aerial view showing Library of Congress and Annex, 1939, Prints and Photographs Division. https://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2012646221/; Library of Congress Annual Report for 1938. Hathi Trust, 2023. https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015011733105&seq=59&view=1up

 

With the bindery moving to the Annex, the GPO, in consultation with new Librarian Archibald MacLeish, agreed that the binding office would receive all new equipment in the new space. On March 30, 1939, the bindery staff loaded up carts with the items they were working on and cleaned up the workstations one last time, leaving the large equipment for removal. The following day, around 50 staff of the GPO and Library took the elevator down one level to the tunnel connecting to the Annex building, pushed the trucks carefully down the slope and into the Library’s future.

Minerva and the Library Cats by Chantal Martin

 

Thank you to Cheryl Fox of the Manuscript Division for her help in developing this post and providing various items for review from the Library of Congress Archives.

Subscribe to this blog so that you can follow up with the next three parts of this year-long celebration of binding at the Library of Congress, as well as some great posts by the rest of the Preservation Directorate staff.

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *