Introducing Carolyn Bennett, 2018-2019 Library of Congress Teacher in Residence

This post is by Carolyn Bennett, the 2018-2019 Library of Congress Teacher in Residence.

Carolyn Bennett. Photo by Shawn Miller

Tell us a bit about yourself.

I teach vocal and general music for grades 6-12 at a small, rural school in Connecticut. I’ve played the piano my whole life; I was reading music before I was reading words.

How did you come to apply to be a Library of Congress Teacher in Residence?

I love writing curriculum and designing new, creative classroom activities. I also love history, so I pursued this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to combine those passions.

What are your goals for your year as Teacher in Residence?

I’m here to share primary-source repertoire gems with the music education community, modeling how interacting with this repertoire can create well-rounded, standards-based musical experiences.  Seemingly disparate priorities compete for music teachers’ attention: ever-evolving initiatives, standards, and the desire for excellent performances. We can address many of these priorities by thoughtfully selecting rich repertoire. Primary-source repertoire connects us to a rich heritage of musical traditions. The pieces invite analysis and critical musical decision-making, adding our own creative voices to the narrative. Educational priorities naturally emerge as students engage with rich repertoire.

For non-music educators, primary sources cultivate quality interdisciplinary learning opportunities.  Musical sources naturally branch out in so many learning directions.  Studying music can make students better historians, writers, readers, and scientists.  Primary sources offer authentic opportunities for educators to work together in mutually beneficial interdisciplinary partnerships, and I hope to provide the insight educators may need to incorporate music effectively in their classroom.

Visiting George Gershwin’s piano at the Library of Congress. Photo by Shawn Miller

How has using Library of Congress resources changed your teaching?

I used to feel trepidation about teaching music from other cultures or times.  How could I respectfully and accurately teach pieces from musical traditions outside my own familiarity?  I wanted diversity in my classroom, but also wanted authenticity; there’s tension between those two ideals.  By using primary sources, I can discover music alongside my students, guided by the evidence found in notation, recordings, and supporting documents.  Teachers don’t need to have all the answers; we just need to guide students to explore and question.  Teaching with primary sources has empowered me to broaden my repertoire and approach music class as a collaborative learning experience.

What advice would you give to teachers who want to use Library of Congress resources in their work?

The collections are so vast that one could easily ignore a beautiful rose or mighty oak while looking for a daisy.  As a goal-oriented person, I’m often tempted to target an objective and then reverse-engineer learning activities to fit my goal.  However, my most fruitful experiences begin when I discover a compelling piece.  As I analyze the piece, learning activities naturally unfold, and learning outcomes follow.  Even better, by analyzing the piece with students, their perspective guides our learning.  I encourage teachers to browse the collection with few parameters – a culture, historical period, or theme – and an open mind.  When you find the piece that resonates with you and your learning community, it will lead you to great musical and educational experiences.

One Comment

  1. Sherrie Galloway
    October 1, 2018 at 6:14 pm

    Congratulations Carolyn. You are in for a magical experience. Welcome to the TIR Club!

Add a Comment

This blog is governed by the general rules of respectful civil discourse. You are fully responsible for everything that you post. The content of all comments is released into the public domain unless clearly stated otherwise. The Library of Congress does not control the content posted. Nevertheless, the Library of Congress may monitor any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove content for any reason whatever, without consent. Gratuitous links to sites are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on the Library site. Read our Comment and Posting Policy.

Required fields are indicated with an * asterisk.