Top of page

There are More Tools for Digital Curation Than You Might Think

Share this post:

On January 6, 2012, I had the opportunity to attend CurateGear, an interactive, day-long event focused on digital curation tools and methods held at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Trevor Owens from the Library of Congress Presenting ViewShare at CurateGear
Trevor Owens from the Library of Congress Presenting ViewShare at CurateGear

This meeting did many things right.

It introduced attendees to the wide spectrum of digital curation activities, from appraisal to ingest to auditing and preservation.  The general nature of these activities is not dissimilar to those working with physical archives, but there are some specific challenges for which tools and workflows are needed. For example:  automated assessment and extraction of technical and structural information from and about files, creation of authentic copies made from the original media, assignment of fixities for preservation auditing and the extraction and creation of metadata. There is a growing community of practice in these areas.

Each session contained four speakers who were limited to 15 minutes each.  Then each session was followed by an hour of demos by the speakers from the previous sessions.  And they had to be live demos.  That’s right, the attendees got the opportunity to see a live demo of every tool that was presented.  And there were long breaks where people got to meet each other and compare notes. More conferences should do this.

The organizers invited speakers who are, for the most part, practitioners in the field, who have experience they can share and tools they can show.  Not every tool is available –some are in development–but it was a great learning opportunity to see what practices, workflows and tools exist, or should exist and so are being developed.

The people who participated in this event as speakers or attendees came from many communities: federal agencies, research university archives, state archives, library and information schools and digital forensics and it was exciting to see so much overlap and conversation. Among the tools and services that were presented at the conference were:

I strongly encourage people to go to the CurateGear site to review the presentations that have been posted. This is an exciting area of tool development, addressing the needs of the automation of digital collection appraisal and ingest and the curation these collections throughout their life cycle.  Some of these tools are already available as open source, and there is most definitely a lot of room for participation in these efforts and in the development of new ones.


Comments (5)

  1. Hey, don’t forget the Curator’s Workbench, a free and open source tool for capture, arrangement and description of digital materials. It also supported batch migration of arbitrary tabular metadata to MODS. I doubt that I can add a link in this comment field, but you can find it easily.


  2. Leslie, if you can scare up that comprehensive list, I would find it immensely useful (probably among others!).

  3. I attended CurateGear, and as a grad student in the School of Information Sciences at University of Tennessee, most of it was way over my head. But still, I think it was useful to attend to see all that’s going on. I’m sure the terms will become clearer to me as I learn more.

  4. Leslie, thank you for the review of the event. I wanted to let everyone know that the presentations (for which we have author permissions) are available on the DigCCurr website:

    Heather Barnes (DigCCurr Fellow)

Add a Comment

This blog is governed by the general rules of respectful civil discourse. You are fully responsible for everything that you post. The content of all comments is released into the public domain unless clearly stated otherwise. The Library of Congress does not control the content posted. Nevertheless, the Library of Congress may monitor any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove content for any reason whatever, without consent. Gratuitous links to sites are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on the Library site. Read our Comment and Posting Policy.

Required fields are indicated with an * asterisk.