Control Issues: A Report of SXSW ’18

We went to the SXSW Conference this year to reach an audience of tech developers with our session Hacking the Library of Congress. As you may expect from an emerging technology conference, sessions on virtual reality (VR) (48 sessions) and blockchain (29 sessions) dominated the week.  At the Virtual Cinema, attendees demoed a variety of VR and augmented reality (AR) experiences– some of the most compelling of which were full-sensory mixed reality (MR) works such as Meow Wolf’s The Atrium. Panelists painted visions of the future that were as hopeful (blockchain democratizing the web) as they were scary (AI taking over humanity). Attendees took breaks at rest stations with VR vacation experiences and baby goats.

A winding line of concert-goers waiting for venue doors to open at South By Southwest

The hundreds of panels, meet-up sessions and networking events created a bubble in the city of more than 50,000 attendees. A bubble that was not burst by scary local events or realities….

Labs was interested in seeing past the hype of emerging technologies like AI (artificial intelligence) and blockchain to how they can be applied responsibly in cultural heritage spaces. Conference speakers from industries that are leading the way in adopting AI and machine learning revealed issues at the conference around transparency and control that are especially important for us to consider. How do we get our authoritative holdings to compete with invisible Google algorithms? How do we keep up with the demands of digital preservation in a market that doesn’t value it? How do we push back on our dependency on electronic journal vendors with ever-increasing subscription prices? We are interested in exploring the hidden controls of new technologies and how they could affect our profession.

In the session AR/VR Evolution or Revolution?, Tony Parisi of Unity Technologies spoke of the inevitability that all computing platforms will eventually move to the VR/AR space. The more important question is for consumers to decide what their “Personal Reality” will be. Given that attendees experienced a different reality than the rest of Austin that week, it made us wonder about this trajectory. A critical component of our work in cultural heritage is to present people with things that may not be pleasant in order to teach important lessons about history (the US Holocaust Memorial Museum is a great example). Doing this type of work in a world dominated by “Personal Realities” will be more critical than ever.

Case studies from the Pharmaceutical industry using VR for empathetic education really resonated with us. Companies are designing experiences to train doctors on what it’s like to tour a smoker’s lung or experience symptoms of chronic illness such as migraines. The collections libraries serve create empathetic connections all the time, and we see a huge potential to amplify these moments of transformation between a patron and an object through contextualized virtual and mixed reality. Great examples of this potential include the Smithsonian American Art Museum’s ”SAAM VR” product created with Intel and NASA’s “Beethoven’s 5th” VR film created in collaboration with Google.

a virtual reality beach break station at which a person is lounging in a hammock wearing a virtual reality headset in front of a sunset scene backdrop

Dell Intel provided relaxing virtual reality beach breaks for SXSW attendees.

Artificial Intelligence, the glue that makes these technologies possible, was discussed in the session “Letting Go: Designing for an AI you Can’t Control” by UX Designers representing Bonsai, Facebook, Singularity University, and Evoke.ai. As AI takes away the dependency for humans to wield the technology, designers are now freed to point AI to problems and dictate what positive outcomes should be. Instead of comparing users to some type of average, for example, the technology can adapt to who users are in the moment and how they change their behavior through time (referred to as “behavior systems”). This shift in the traditional power paradigm places importance on AI products to be transparent – showing a breadcrumb trail of decisions to users, and giving them multiple opportunities to say no as they engage with the product. Microsoft’s chatbot “Tay”, which was shut down only 16 hours after it was launched in 2016 after it began tweeting racist and sexual statements, was cited as an example of how very real an AI system failure could be – and what populations it could hurt.

The human role, more than ever, is to bring an ethical lens and critical questions to the design process. We must understand where the data is coming from, bring diverse perspectives into the process before the system is formed, and understand how a failure can affect certain populations. Here we see many parallels to the great initiatives around data already in place in the cultural heritage community by groups such as Always Already Computational, Frictionless Data, DocNow, WikiWomen in Red.

Of all of the technology mentioned, blockchain proved to be the most elusive and misunderstood by attendees. Kim Jackson of Singular TV and the documentary filmmaker Alex Winter predicted the hype of blockchain as an easy money scheme will soon fade, and the technology with many useful applications will one day be as invisible to users as – to paraphrase Winter –  JavaScript is to the web. The speakers discussed possible outcomes of a decentralized web, such as users being able to conduct monetary transaction directly (eliminating the need for banks), and users controlling their own personal information, as opposed to being forced to submit PII repeatedly with every new online service they subscribe to. We think blockchain could be a huge game-changer for cultural heritage institutions. A digital ledger system could help authenticate the digital items we serve, ensuring the integrity of our primary resources when cited by third parties. Blockchain technology could also improve our understanding of how the items we make available are used. Imagine the implications for measuring impact and fundraising if we could see a history of an item by every person that had cited it!

In closing, we appreciated the opportunity to parse through the hype, fear, and promise of emerging technologies at SXSW as some of the only cultural heritage representatives in attendance. Labs looks forward to piloting these technologies (except the goats) at the Library of Congress on our experiments page and using this blog to offer thoughtful critique about our experiences.

Add a Comment

This blog is governed by the general rules of respectful civil discourse. You are fully responsible for everything that you post. The content of all comments is released into the public domain unless clearly stated otherwise. The Library of Congress does not control the content posted. Nevertheless, the Library of Congress may monitor any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove content for any reason whatever, without consent. Gratuitous links to sites are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on the Library site. Read our Comment and Posting Policy.

Required fields are indicated with an * asterisk.