Open Science Framework: Meeting Researchers Where They Are

This is a guest post by Megan Potterbusch, National Digital Stewardship resident at the Association of Research Libraries.

Megan Pottersbusch. Photo by Alfield Reeves.

Megan Pottersbusch. Photo by Alfield Reeves.

Openly sharing research data, code and methodology are integral parts of open science. Whether due to disciplinary culture shifts or funder and publisher mandates, the general trend towards open science has been increasing in many research fields. Researchers and disciplines differ in their understanding of open science, to the extent that I cannot assert that open science falls consistently within Open Access; however, the majority of researchers with whom I’ve spoken consider these as overlapping movements.

Regardless, open science functions as a way to increase scientific transparency and the integrity of research. When done well, this increased transparency improves the research process and builds trust in the results.

Many projects and tools exist to support open access to data and scientific code in various ways, and there are many creative and flexible project-management systems used by research labs. However, there are few tools designed to both support effective project management and open science, and even fewer, if any, that have native support for registration (essentially a time-stamped snapshot of research) or preregistration .

The Open Science Framework, a product of the Center for Open Science, is designed to encourage and assist the movement towards open science by providing a free space that supports the entire research lifecycle, from data collection and analysis to preservation and long-term access. With an intuitive interface and flexible design, the OSF allows researchers to organize and structure their projects to match their research needs without compromising their current workflows. By supporting add-ons, the OSF enables users to connect various services (e.g. Google Drive, Dropbox, Dataverse and GitHub) to their projects, thus removing the need to completely change tools.

Although designed to promote openness and collaboration, each project created in the OSF begins as private and can remain so for as long the project’s administrators desire. Changing a project to public is as easy as clicking a button. Public projects can receive digital object identifiers through the OSF even while the project is still underway, because everything in the OSF is version controlled and you can see a history of the changes, additions and deletions.

In order to motivate researchers to establish more transparent and open scientific practices, the COS created the $1,000,000 Preregistration Challenge, one thousand awards of $1,000 each, which offers researchers the opportunity to earn $1,000 by clearly outlining and describing their research plan and methods in the OSF before beginning their research.

Additionally they have identified and established relationships with a large number of respected journals in a variety of disciplines that have demonstrated a commitment to transparency and reproducibility. Publishing a researcher’s  preregistration alongside the article(s) from the study allows readers, reviewers and publishers a chance to not only see the data but also to examine the methodology behind the research and see what changed over the course of the research process.

This transparency helps prevent practices like p-hacking and HARKing, which negatively impact the integrity of scientific results. This is not to imply that the methods and data must stay exactly consistent with the researcher’s initial plans; instead, anything that did change over the course of the research must be outlined and accounted for in the final article(s).

Essentially, the OSF aims to lower the barriers faced by researchers interested in increasing the openness and transparency of their research practices and outputs. Flexibility of settings and structure allow each project administrator to control if, when and how their work becomes open. With all the conversations and momentum around open science and Open Access, the OSF aims to fill the clear need in the scholarly communication ecosystem for a public good to support this work, which may prove vital to the integrity and understanding of modern research.

Assembling the Whole: An Interview with Librarian|Artist Oliver Baez Bendorf

Oliver Baez Bendorf is a poet, cartoonist, librarian, teaching artist and activist. He holds an MFA in Poetry and MLIS from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, author of the book of poems The Spectral Wilderness (Kent State University Press 2015) and an essay on activism in the forthcoming Poet-Librarians in the Library of Babel (Library Juice […]

Read Collections as Data Report Summary

Our Collections as Data event in September 2016 on exploring the computational use of library collections was a success on several levels, including helping steer our team at National Digital Initiatives in our path of action. We are pleased to release the following summary report which includes an executive summary of the event, the outline […]

IEEE Big Data Conference 2016: Computational Archival Science

This is a guest post by Meredith Claire Broadway,a consultant for the World Bank. Computational Archival Science can be regarded as the intersection between the archival profession and “hard” technical fields, such as computer science and engineering. CAS applies computational methods and resources to large-scale records and archives processing, analysis, storage, long-term preservation and access. […]

The University of Richmond’s Digital Scholarship Lab

In November, 2016, staff from the Library of Congress’s National Digital Initiatives division visited the University of Richmond’s Digital Scholarship Lab as part of NDI’s efforts to explore data librarianship, computational research and digital scholarship at other libraries and cultural institutions. Like many university digital labs, the DSL is based in the library, which DSL […]

FADGI’s 10th Anniversary: Adapting to Meet the Community’s Needs

This is a guest post by Kate Murray, IT Specialist in the Library of Congress’s Digital Collections and Management Services. Started in 2007 as a collaborative effort by federal agencies, FADGI has many accomplishments under its belt, including the widely implemented Technical Guidelines for Digitizing Cultural Heritage Materials (newly updated in 2016); open source software, […]

Spotlighting Research Data: Building Relationships with Outreach for the NYU Data Catalog

This is a guest post by Nicole Contaxis, Data Catalog Coordinator at NYU Health Sciences Library. You can email her at [email protected] An increasing number of publishers and grant-funding organizations are requiring researchers to share their data, so libraries and other institutions are creating tools and strategies to support researchers in this effort. To meet […]