{ subscribe_url: '/share/sites/library-of-congress-blogs/law.php' }

On the Shelf – Library Treaties

As we’ve noted in the blog before, the Class K schedule was not completed until the 1960s.  Prior to that, law material was either classified under the old “LAW” scheme or in the JX class.

Our serials cataloger, Brian Kuhagen, is working hard to put everything in order under the K schedule.  His latest projects are the different treaty series (Treaty Series (“TS”) and Treaties and Other International Agreements (“TIAS”)).  Like me, he is hard-pressed not to peruse the titles he is working on.  In the TIAS series he noticed items under the heading “Exchange of Official Publications” and brought them to my attention.

Exchange of Official Publications, U.S.-Col., July 15, 1949, 63 Stat. 2799 (Photo by Betty Lupinacci)

These bilateral treaties form the foundation of part of our foreign legal collection of primary source materials.

I’d always wondered how these agreements were negotiated.  As it turns out, at least in the late 1940s and early 1950s, no matter the process, the final agreements are fairly formulaic documents.

After an introductory paragraph about the negotiations (or in this case “conversations”), the first paragraph lays out, in general terms, what will be exchanged.  Here they refer to lists of official government publications that each party selects.

Paragraph 2 gives the exchange offices for each country.  During this time period the United States used the Smithsonian Institution as its official designee for handling these exchanges.

Paragraph 3 establishes where the material will be sent – namely the Library of Congress.  [Though I did glance at later documents and found that paragraph 2 was frequently not included in favor of the Library acting in both capacities.]

The rest of these documents discuss what won’t be sent, who pays the costs, etc.  A few of them also contain translations, following the English text, in the 2nd party’s official language.

The specific language may vary a little, but most are practically identical, save for the name and designee of the 2nd jurisdiction.  Any differences seem slight.  For example, in Treaty no. 3141 (1953), Pakistan requests that they be sent the “Monthly Catalogue of the publications of the Government of the United States” for additional selections to the existing list from their 1951 treaty.

While it’s always fun leafing through the paper copies the Law Library maintains for archival purposes, we are making these treaty titles available online for your convenience.

 

Cornell University Law Library – Pic of the Week

I was in Ithaca, N.Y. recently for a meeting of the Northeast Foreign Law Libraries Cooperative Group (NEFLLCG) hosted by Cornell University Law Library. This group meets semiannually to discuss collection development issues, new acquisitions, and ensure the law collections in the region sufficiently represent foreign jurisdictions. Whenever I attend a conference or meeting, in […]

An Interview with Marie-Philippe Lavoie, Foreign Law Intern

Today’s interview is with Marie-Philippe Lavoie, a foreign law intern with the Global Legal Research Directorate (GLRD). This summer, Marie-Philippe is assisting the GLRD with Canadian law research requests. She is currently completing her LL.M degree in international law at the University of Montreal. Describe your background. I am from the Province of Québec in Canada. I […]

UK Supreme Court rules “Deport first, appeal later” power is unlawful

The following is a guest post by Conleth Burns, a foreign law intern working this summer in the Global Legal Research Directorate of the Law Library of Congress. Recently, in the R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] UKSC 17 case, the United Kingdom (U.K) Supreme Court issued a decision concerning the ability […]

Attorney Advertising in Germany

On July 14, 1987, the German Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht, BVerfG) rendered two decisions that paved the way to allowing attorney advertising in Germany. Nicknamed the “Bastille decisions” because of the date and their ”revolutionary character,” the decisions allowed attorneys for the first time to advertise their services to the public on a regular basis although several […]

Preserving resources from Haiti: On the Shelf

Preserving law sources is one of our top priorities and every day we find ourselves working with different jurisdictions.  In May, as we were working on reclassifying Law-classed materials, our serials cataloger came across some deteriorating issues of the law reports of Haiti, La Gazette du palais: organe juridique.  As a law source, this bimonthly […]

A Congress.gov Interview with Natalie Buda Smith, User Experience Team Supervisor

This week’s interview is with Natalie Buda Smith. Natalie is a user experience team supervisor here at the Library of Congress. Describe your background. Most of my 25+ year career has been in the field of user experience, working in different countries for a range of organizations including Fortune 500 companies, non-profits, and federal agencies. […]