Encouraging Student Understanding of Negotiation and the Value of Notetaking during the 1787 Constitutional Convention

This post was written by Lee Ann Potter, Director of Learning and Innovation at the Library of Congress.

In the September 2019 issue of Social Education, the journal of the National Council for the Social Studies, our “Sources and Strategies” article featured two pages from James Madison’s Original Notes on Debates at the Federal Constitutional Convention, 1787. Specifically, the pages were two of the seven pages that Madison wrote describing the events of Monday, June 18, 1787.

James Madison’s Original Notes on Debates at the Federal Constitutional Convention, 1787, image 173

James Madison’s Original Notes on Debates at the Federal Constitutional Convention, page 174

The 18th was unusual because Alexander Hamilton, a 30-year old delegate from New York who had not contributed much to the discussion since the convention began four weeks earlier, spoke up—and did so for about six hours! According to Madison, in those hours, Hamilton “declared himself unfriendly to both plans” for the federal government that delegates Edmund Randolph and William Patterson had proposed, the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan.

Instead, Hamilton provided a sketch for a strong federal government that contained eleven core elements, or articles. Among them were: a bicameral legislature with power to pass all laws; a House elected by the people for three years; a Senate elected by electors from electoral districts to serve for life; a Governor to be chosen by the people voting in electoral districts to serve during good behavior; and state governors to be appointed by the Federal Government.

The first of Hamilton’s articles, that appeared on the preceding page, proposed that “The Supreme Legislative power of the United States of America to be vested in two different bodies of men; the one to be called the Assembly, the other the Senate who together shall form the Legislature of the United States with power to pass all laws whatsoever subject to the Negative hereafter mentioned.”

The teaching suggestions we included in the article began by encouraging a brief class discussion about the extent to which this first idea was ultimately included or reflected in the Constitution.

Our next suggestion was to divide students into 10 groups; provide them with a copy of the two featured sources; assign each group one element (article) of Hamilton’s sketch and direct them to compare Hamilton’s proposal with what was included in the Virginia and New Jersey plans, and eventually included in the Constitution.

Finally, we encouraged a class discussion to highlight the similarities and differences—and for students to consider the roles played by negotiation and compromise at the convention, as well as the value of Madison’s notes.

If you tried these suggestions, or a variation of them, with your students as you celebrated Constitution Day earlier this month, tell us about your experience!

 

“A Republic, If You Can Keep It”

In anticipation of Constitution Day, our “Sources and Strategies” article in the September 2016 issue of Social Education, the journal of the National Council for the Social Studies, suggested provoking student interest in civic responsibility with an 18th century diary entry. The featured entry was that of James McHenry, written on September 18, 1787.

Exploring the Legacy of Magna Carta with Students through Historic Images

The medieval English charter known as Magna Carta was intended as a local political document, created to make peace between England’s King John and his barons in the early thirteenth century. However, it carried within it powerful ideas about the limits of government and the importance of individual liberty, and its influence has spread across the centuries and around the globe.

Voting Rights – The Full Enfranchisement of African Americans

The original Constitution of the United States was nearly mute on voting rights, ceding them to the states to determine. The 15th Amendment to the Constitution confers voting rights on African Americans, declaring that “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.”